Lynn Ze Fahrrad
@lynnzegreyt.bsky.social
If it`s all not meant to be taken literally, then this person wouldn`t feel the need to say that "Philosophy doesn’t drive the TERFiness".
November 1, 2025 at 11:07 PM
If it`s all not meant to be taken literally, then this person wouldn`t feel the need to say that "Philosophy doesn’t drive the TERFiness".
"Reality based liberal" lol
Maybe in your wet dreams.
Maybe in your wet dreams.
October 12, 2025 at 8:13 PM
"Reality based liberal" lol
Maybe in your wet dreams.
Maybe in your wet dreams.
Aaaaaand I already am absolutely sure that it`s not a feminist meeting.
You were right.
I only needed to take a look.
You were right.
I only needed to take a look.
October 10, 2025 at 7:48 PM
Aaaaaand I already am absolutely sure that it`s not a feminist meeting.
You were right.
I only needed to take a look.
You were right.
I only needed to take a look.
JKR: "The Trans movement is anti-truth and anti-critical thinking"
Also JKR: *fällt auf AI-Scheiße rein*
Also JKR: *fällt auf AI-Scheiße rein*
September 18, 2025 at 4:40 PM
JKR: "The Trans movement is anti-truth and anti-critical thinking"
Also JKR: *fällt auf AI-Scheiße rein*
Also JKR: *fällt auf AI-Scheiße rein*
"scamming vulnerable ppl"?
You don`t even know me.
I`m trans myself and there`s no harm whatsoever in my therapy.
Neither can you gaslight me to believe that.
Not with your mantras.
And not with tired memes either.
You don`t even know me.
I`m trans myself and there`s no harm whatsoever in my therapy.
Neither can you gaslight me to believe that.
Not with your mantras.
And not with tired memes either.
September 5, 2025 at 4:24 PM
"scamming vulnerable ppl"?
You don`t even know me.
I`m trans myself and there`s no harm whatsoever in my therapy.
Neither can you gaslight me to believe that.
Not with your mantras.
And not with tired memes either.
You don`t even know me.
I`m trans myself and there`s no harm whatsoever in my therapy.
Neither can you gaslight me to believe that.
Not with your mantras.
And not with tired memes either.
Well, I`m glad you like our signs.
Sometimes, we also get amused by them.
Sometimes, we also get amused by them.
August 8, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Well, I`m glad you like our signs.
Sometimes, we also get amused by them.
Sometimes, we also get amused by them.
Nowhere. Cause it`s in the Code of Practice.
July 27, 2025 at 7:58 PM
Nowhere. Cause it`s in the Code of Practice.
Here.
Let me just randomly quote sh*t.
Let me just randomly quote sh*t.
July 27, 2025 at 7:49 PM
Here.
Let me just randomly quote sh*t.
Let me just randomly quote sh*t.
"Have you seen those guys in masks up close. I have. They're terrifying."
Yeah, they´re very terrifying indeed.
Yet your "women`s movement" had no problem siding with them.
Yeah, they´re very terrifying indeed.
Yet your "women`s movement" had no problem siding with them.
July 27, 2025 at 3:28 PM
"Have you seen those guys in masks up close. I have. They're terrifying."
Yeah, they´re very terrifying indeed.
Yet your "women`s movement" had no problem siding with them.
Yeah, they´re very terrifying indeed.
Yet your "women`s movement" had no problem siding with them.
Jeden, der Option 3 gewählt hat, zeig ich an wegen Majestätsbeleidigung. 😂
July 26, 2025 at 3:20 PM
Jeden, der Option 3 gewählt hat, zeig ich an wegen Majestätsbeleidigung. 😂
The "scientific" article itself even admits that they can`t prove a causality.
And isn`t it funny how suddenly low quality studies should be taken seriously when it fits your agenda?
When the "Cass review" dismissed most of the available evidence because it was "low quality", transphobes defended it
And isn`t it funny how suddenly low quality studies should be taken seriously when it fits your agenda?
When the "Cass review" dismissed most of the available evidence because it was "low quality", transphobes defended it
July 1, 2025 at 11:26 AM
The "scientific" article itself even admits that they can`t prove a causality.
And isn`t it funny how suddenly low quality studies should be taken seriously when it fits your agenda?
When the "Cass review" dismissed most of the available evidence because it was "low quality", transphobes defended it
And isn`t it funny how suddenly low quality studies should be taken seriously when it fits your agenda?
When the "Cass review" dismissed most of the available evidence because it was "low quality", transphobes defended it
Hey Helen, just one question: Why didn`t you post this on bluesky? Were you maybe afraid that people might challenge your central claim?
July 1, 2025 at 1:15 AM
Hey Helen, just one question: Why didn`t you post this on bluesky? Were you maybe afraid that people might challenge your central claim?
Just so you know: This nonsense right here will be the reason why you`ll be voted out while "Radicals" (aka Trans politicians with principles) like Zooey Zephyr will be supported even through harsh times and will always stay above you.
June 17, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Just so you know: This nonsense right here will be the reason why you`ll be voted out while "Radicals" (aka Trans politicians with principles) like Zooey Zephyr will be supported even through harsh times and will always stay above you.
The official definition of "Trans woman".
Die mad about it~
Die mad about it~
June 8, 2025 at 2:04 AM
The official definition of "Trans woman".
Die mad about it~
Die mad about it~
Mantras are not facts.
June 7, 2025 at 5:39 PM
Mantras are not facts.
"raging against reality"?
Pah! What reality? The reality that Merriam Webster clearly says that Trans women are women? The reality that Biologists and Cis women both are speaking up against your ideology?
Pah! What reality? The reality that Merriam Webster clearly says that Trans women are women? The reality that Biologists and Cis women both are speaking up against your ideology?
June 7, 2025 at 12:17 PM
"raging against reality"?
Pah! What reality? The reality that Merriam Webster clearly says that Trans women are women? The reality that Biologists and Cis women both are speaking up against your ideology?
Pah! What reality? The reality that Merriam Webster clearly says that Trans women are women? The reality that Biologists and Cis women both are speaking up against your ideology?
Dude, I have eyes.
May 23, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Dude, I have eyes.
"not the masked , threatening blokes who so often seem to turn up & try to halt them"
Last time I checked, GCs really took a liking to the masked, threatening blokes.
Last time I checked, GCs really took a liking to the masked, threatening blokes.
April 20, 2025 at 7:59 PM
"not the masked , threatening blokes who so often seem to turn up & try to halt them"
Last time I checked, GCs really took a liking to the masked, threatening blokes.
Last time I checked, GCs really took a liking to the masked, threatening blokes.
Even among Democrats, the 2nd Amendment is mostly rated either very important or somewhat important.
February 25, 2025 at 11:21 PM
Even among Democrats, the 2nd Amendment is mostly rated either very important or somewhat important.
This is how we do it in Europe.
February 25, 2025 at 4:36 PM
This is how we do it in Europe.
Oh, look! They did the thing! But for an entire demographic.
February 14, 2025 at 2:23 AM
Oh, look! They did the thing! But for an entire demographic.
That crying bag is killing me.
January 25, 2025 at 11:11 PM
That crying bag is killing me.