lucerez
@lucerez.bsky.social
🌱 and rp watcher transplant. [posts are about roleplay/video games.]
Yes! Boo. Also the reviews made me question my sanity bc they were gushing about how great the author is but they must not have even been reading bc the prompts were there to see! Help
July 6, 2025 at 5:45 AM
Yes! Boo. Also the reviews made me question my sanity bc they were gushing about how great the author is but they must not have even been reading bc the prompts were there to see! Help
I encountered two fics on ao3 where the "authors" were passing them off as their writing, but they both forgot to remove the prompts one time... killed my interest in reading new fics there :/
July 6, 2025 at 3:15 AM
I encountered two fics on ao3 where the "authors" were passing them off as their writing, but they both forgot to remove the prompts one time... killed my interest in reading new fics there :/
Reposted by lucerez
Now from Öztürk’s ACLU lawyer Esha Bhandari:
“Rümeysa Öztürk’s case is unprecedented and shocking. She has been held behind bars for six weeks while her health deteriorates for writing an op-ed.”
“Rümeysa Öztürk’s case is unprecedented and shocking. She has been held behind bars for six weeks while her health deteriorates for writing an op-ed.”
May 6, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Now from Öztürk’s ACLU lawyer Esha Bhandari:
“Rümeysa Öztürk’s case is unprecedented and shocking. She has been held behind bars for six weeks while her health deteriorates for writing an op-ed.”
“Rümeysa Öztürk’s case is unprecedented and shocking. She has been held behind bars for six weeks while her health deteriorates for writing an op-ed.”
People say "they're voting against their own interests", but we need to ask what those interests are first. Seems to me they are voting exactly in line with their priorities.
April 28, 2025 at 12:34 PM
People say "they're voting against their own interests", but we need to ask what those interests are first. Seems to me they are voting exactly in line with their priorities.
Reposted by lucerez
Raskin and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) are giving law firms until April 28 to answer their Qs about who facilitated the deals they cut with Trump and what terms they agreed to.
Firms who got this letter:
Cadwalader
A&O Shearman
Latham & Watkins
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
Kirkland & Ellis
Firms who got this letter:
Cadwalader
A&O Shearman
Latham & Watkins
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
Kirkland & Ellis
April 22, 2025 at 7:30 PM
Raskin and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) are giving law firms until April 28 to answer their Qs about who facilitated the deals they cut with Trump and what terms they agreed to.
Firms who got this letter:
Cadwalader
A&O Shearman
Latham & Watkins
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
Kirkland & Ellis
Firms who got this letter:
Cadwalader
A&O Shearman
Latham & Watkins
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
Kirkland & Ellis
Knowing how many gamers supported the orange menace.....
April 5, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Knowing how many gamers supported the orange menace.....
Reposted by lucerez
5/ In a stunning announcement, Trump said that no government contracts would go to companies that employ legal firms that represent Democratic causes, a brazen and illegal attempt to cut off legal support for his opposition and lawsuits against him. www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...
US law firm Paul Weiss fired by client over Trump executive order
Law firm Paul Weiss said in a court filing on Wednesday that a former executive facing criminal bribery charges has fired it as his defense counsel because of U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order this month targeting the firm.
www.reuters.com
March 20, 2025 at 3:38 PM
5/ In a stunning announcement, Trump said that no government contracts would go to companies that employ legal firms that represent Democratic causes, a brazen and illegal attempt to cut off legal support for his opposition and lawsuits against him. www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...
Reposted by lucerez
9/ The tariffs are DESIGNED to create economic hardship. Why? So that Trump has a straight face rationale for releasing them, business by business or industry by industry.
As he adjusts or grants relief, it’s a win-win: the economy improves and dissent disappears.
As he adjusts or grants relief, it’s a win-win: the economy improves and dissent disappears.
April 3, 2025 at 3:29 AM
9/ The tariffs are DESIGNED to create economic hardship. Why? So that Trump has a straight face rationale for releasing them, business by business or industry by industry.
As he adjusts or grants relief, it’s a win-win: the economy improves and dissent disappears.
As he adjusts or grants relief, it’s a win-win: the economy improves and dissent disappears.
Reposted by lucerez
2/ This week you will read many confused economists and political pundits who won’t understand how the tariffs make economic sense.
That’s because they don’t. They aren’t designed as economic policy. The tariffs are simply a new, super dangerous political tool.
That’s because they don’t. They aren’t designed as economic policy. The tariffs are simply a new, super dangerous political tool.
April 3, 2025 at 3:29 AM
2/ This week you will read many confused economists and political pundits who won’t understand how the tariffs make economic sense.
That’s because they don’t. They aren’t designed as economic policy. The tariffs are simply a new, super dangerous political tool.
That’s because they don’t. They aren’t designed as economic policy. The tariffs are simply a new, super dangerous political tool.