Well, that’s a convincing argument. I must concede your point.

So we backed down once in the 1950s and it worked, so we should back down again. I guess we should have voted for Poillevre who wanted to follow this 1950s example from the start?

This thread literally started because a Liberal (not a socialist or conservative) called out Carney for breaking promises.

"This guy" is a former Minister of Foreign Affairs in a Liberal government and President of the University of Winnipeg.

I suspect that this guy wants Carney to stop acting like Poillevre won the election. That's not what Canadians voted for.

They had a right to a hearing, but some opted to not take advantage of that right. Now they lose that option. No more due process.

Yesterday’s front page story was “Smith and Moe renew calls for Ottawa to allow more resource development.”