logan
@loganschmidt.bsky.social
Abolitionist | Oenophile | Sounders fan | Cat Dad | he/him | 🏳️🌈🇨🇦🇨🇭
Reposted by logan
How could you, Minnesota has never tried it.
November 25, 2025 at 7:55 PM
How could you, Minnesota has never tried it.
What is this from????
November 23, 2025 at 5:42 AM
What is this from????
Amendment 113 "Adopt State model code requirements for setbacks"
Just for clarity/searchability sake: seattle.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=... pg. 207
Just for clarity/searchability sake: seattle.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=... pg. 207
seattle.legistar.com
November 17, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Amendment 113 "Adopt State model code requirements for setbacks"
Just for clarity/searchability sake: seattle.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=... pg. 207
Just for clarity/searchability sake: seattle.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=... pg. 207
seattle.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=...
In NR, "if the rear setback abuts an alley, no rear setback is required." pg.63
CM Rivera introduced a late amendment that rewrote the setback requirements which is why the section you're looking at has that language struck out (it conflicts with this table)
In NR, "if the rear setback abuts an alley, no rear setback is required." pg.63
CM Rivera introduced a late amendment that rewrote the setback requirements which is why the section you're looking at has that language struck out (it conflicts with this table)
November 17, 2025 at 5:00 PM
seattle.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=...
In NR, "if the rear setback abuts an alley, no rear setback is required." pg.63
CM Rivera introduced a late amendment that rewrote the setback requirements which is why the section you're looking at has that language struck out (it conflicts with this table)
In NR, "if the rear setback abuts an alley, no rear setback is required." pg.63
CM Rivera introduced a late amendment that rewrote the setback requirements which is why the section you're looking at has that language struck out (it conflicts with this table)
don't see home tix up yet! Still today sometime?
October 20, 2025 at 9:34 PM
don't see home tix up yet! Still today sometime?
Reposted by logan
This campaign is people-powered, not corporate sponsored!
This endeavor is going to be a big uphill battle for sure. The incumbent is a corporate establishment Democrat with already $2M at his disposal.
Please consider donating if you can spare!
This endeavor is going to be a big uphill battle for sure. The incumbent is a corporate establishment Democrat with already $2M at his disposal.
Please consider donating if you can spare!
Donate to Colin Hernandez
Show your support with a contribution.
secure.actblue.com
October 20, 2025 at 8:02 PM
This campaign is people-powered, not corporate sponsored!
This endeavor is going to be a big uphill battle for sure. The incumbent is a corporate establishment Democrat with already $2M at his disposal.
Please consider donating if you can spare!
This endeavor is going to be a big uphill battle for sure. The incumbent is a corporate establishment Democrat with already $2M at his disposal.
Please consider donating if you can spare!
All ball, game’s gone soft… 😪
October 17, 2025 at 3:41 AM
All ball, game’s gone soft… 😪