- Religious exception rulings apply only to the plaintiffs.

- Environmental regulations continue to be enforced despite rulings against them (just not against plaintiffs).

- and on and on.

The left has to use this decision, not just criticize it.

It'll be chaos, but that's what the Justices get.

Too abstract? Feel free to ask.

Mark - Here's the best I've come up with (honest to God fresh quote): When you climb without falling, you think the goal is to avoid falling altogether. But when you have fallen and climbed again, you realize the fall isn’t the end—it’s part of the climb. You learn fear’s boundaries. #FoodforThought

Please don't believe that they're still not...they are...don't make the "measurable" your observation of "the people"...make it of the results and outcomes of policy and consequence. Let's hope there are at least more self-honest individuals than the one's deranged by delusion and self-interest.

Virtually every response as of ~10 minutes after NYT posting credits this truth with an approval rating of 0/10.

😩

Guess what? Yes, the system’s flawed, oppression exists, disparities are real-so now what? Next step isn’t just acknowledging; it’s about what we do next. No sides or excuses-just truth. Cult-like thinking: the “us vs. them” mentality? It all falls apart when we call BS as BS; no matter the source.

Guess what? Yes, the system’s flawed, oppression exists, disparities are real-so now what? Next step isn’t just acknowledging; it’s about what we do next. No sides or excuses-just truth. Cult-like thinking: the “us vs. them” mentality? It all falls apart when we call BS as BS; no matter the source.

"Got a Vonnegut punch for your Atlas shrugs"

And it’s strange how people often assume that success as a charlatan demands brilliance, when more often it simply requires a lack of integrity and the willingness to cast aside principles.

Thanks for the condescension, Mark. The question isn’t who benefits most—it’s whether turning Ukraine’s survival into a commodity pitch is the right conversation to have in the first place.

Thanks for the condescension, Mark. The question isn’t who benefits most—it’s whether turning Ukraine’s survival into a commodity pitch is the right conversation to have in the first place.

You keep saying ‘ditto,’ but it’s not clear what you’re actually getting at. Are you agreeing, or are you implying something? Clarity would save everyone’s time.

Ah yes, because the best way to support a nation fighting for its sovereignty is to frame their survival as a ‘financial transaction.’ Reducing human suffering and preserving democracy apparently takes a backseat to exploiting resources in a war zone. Truly visionary thinking, Mark.

Ah yes, because the best way to support a nation fighting for its sovereignty is to frame their survival as a ‘financial transaction.’ Reducing human suffering and preserving democracy apparently takes a backseat to exploiting resources in a war zone. Truly visionary thinking, Mark.

The point isn’t whether I have a book coming out. It’s that if you’re going to talk a big game, maybe channel some of that relentless self-promotion into actually doing something meaningful.

Do something meaningful, bro. Stop talking about your “forthcoming book” and f’ing do something with your platform

I applaud the nobility of this ‘brand,’ but—there it is: the brand. Easy to lead when it boosts the bottom line. Still waiting to see something bold when the payoff isn’t guaranteed.

Because it DOES matter...otherwise, continue to watch it crumble.