Lizzie Reed
banner
lizziereed.bsky.social
Lizzie Reed
@lizziereed.bsky.social
Associate Prof of #Sociology at Uni of Southampton. Queer lives, visual methods, kinship & identity.

Ask me about my queer feminist trans agenda. She/they 🌈🏳️‍⚧️

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0885-2908
It's absolutely tremendous
November 17, 2025 at 11:06 PM
It's rarely presented in it's natural shape, which is where this listing manages to edge ahead
November 17, 2025 at 9:36 PM
Becoming irretrievably undesirable to men was like top 5 reasons for doing a PhD, for me. I'm not sure why they seem to think it's a negative 😆
November 17, 2025 at 9:35 PM
Thank you for sharing our article - and your kind words! It's so wonderful to hear it has connected with people
November 17, 2025 at 6:14 PM
Reposted by Lizzie Reed
// We must be able to speak about failure without folding it back into a neat part of the narrative of success and without tidying away the hurt that accompanies it.

Sometimes, our research doesn’t feel good, and sometimes we are ill. That’s ok. //
November 5, 2025 at 11:19 AM
Reposted by Lizzie Reed
// The chrononormativity of UKHE is manic. Overwork and urgency are the normative experience for academics, and conforming to these strictures of time is rewarded through the systems of recognition in universities which seek to extract ever more from ever fewer human resources. //
November 5, 2025 at 11:18 AM
[medical and science] research was the second most cited "purpose" of universities (37%). The more complicated 44% figure comes from polling.

It's not quite the damning stat it seems, I think. And interesting insight into uplift of postive view when you tell people universities do research (+8%)
November 17, 2025 at 1:26 PM
Oh super, thank you. I've got a good little range for my students now, much appreciated
November 14, 2025 at 10:09 AM
It indicates cause for his incomprehensible violence. But the excitement about any abnormality seems to suggest that is what "the public" want. Therefore, isn't it beholden on ethical geneticists to refuse to undertake this work?
November 13, 2025 at 6:28 PM
There's a question here, isn't there, about the public good in undertaking this work? Whether his genome shows likelihood of DSD, or anything else, is irrelevant given it tells us nothing about the WHY of his acts, or how to stop it happening again. I don't think you believe
November 13, 2025 at 6:28 PM
You can be and do all those things, just call it a limitation instead of saying it's not going to hold you back. That's what I don't get about this sort of 'disclosure'
November 13, 2025 at 1:49 PM
RIGHT
November 13, 2025 at 1:05 PM
thank you! That is really nice and not angry/bleak like so many, super interesting.
November 13, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Thank you!
November 13, 2025 at 12:56 PM
That haunted waxwork does just keep slithering his way up the ladder.
November 12, 2025 at 10:31 AM
Third scientist: [sadly and quietly] "no, don't, those are my chips"
November 12, 2025 at 10:10 AM