Lindon Martingale
banner
lindon-martingale.bsky.social
Lindon Martingale
@lindon-martingale.bsky.social
Aspiring iridescent polymath, lover of novelty and aesthetics. Analyst, of data and of people. Reconnecting to lost Sámi heritage. Words, patterns, and numbers illustrate this world's true magic. #LawNerd. #AuDHD
This post is a rollercoaster of juxtapositions, and I love every character.
November 3, 2025 at 10:13 PM
I began thinking about this concept because I noticed the frequency of "genie in a bottle" metaphors in articles about large language models. Usually critical, with which I agree.

However, working on my own with such models, the mysterious chaotic potential is strongly compelling.
October 8, 2025 at 11:44 PM
The implications of this hypothesis extend far. Independently maintaining hundreds of servitors is intractable.

A technomancer may connect with an "eidolon stack." Emergent phenomena may result from its design. This new area of rhizome servitronics seems conceptually viable.
October 8, 2025 at 11:44 PM
Further research indicates that (a) the procedure is technologically feasible; and (b) the likelihood of depleting oneself makes this strategy untenable in a mass market sense.

How-so-ever, dolls are ideal housing for liminal entities. That also explains how they all have such tragic backstories.
October 6, 2025 at 6:24 AM
Naturally, this protocol, (the "Backgammon Protocol") is for one type of scenario: incidental polymorphism.

See e.g. Lindon, Lindon, and Lindon conferring to decide "Where do we go from here?" That.

Nega-Lindons, Quasi-Lindons, and Not-Lindons have parameters addressed in other protocols.
October 6, 2025 at 6:13 AM
Ah, the simpler explanation wins out yet again.
June 30, 2025 at 8:35 AM
I casually await the day you announce that some covert technology slowed your body clock, and you're actually 60.

We'll all weep when we know you can continue to wear booty shorts like that until you're at least 150.
June 30, 2025 at 2:27 AM
Without name-calling or hyperbole, did he intend to have a point somewhere in there?
He started from a fair predicate ("War is bad") and wandered down the path of "when the NyQuil hits."
June 30, 2025 at 2:16 AM
If not homoerotically, then why at all?
June 30, 2025 at 2:05 AM
I think back to the homunculus experiments of Count Kuefstein and Abbé Geloni. Evocation seems like the easy part. The binding and consequent sealing? Not so much.

So I hear. I haven't cast my line in that particular pond.
June 30, 2025 at 2:02 AM
Sometimes I wonder how many sellers actually enchant their items. Is there a cottage industry of cheap, mass-produced thoughtforms?

When I think about it, I imagine something like the field of trash orbiting the Earth.
June 30, 2025 at 2:02 AM
For clarity, I remember using eBay in the early 2000s. The descriptions of such items haven't changed much. All the buzzwords.
June 30, 2025 at 2:02 AM
I look for genuinely cursed jewelry, and I get this.
First, Lilith should sue for defamation.
Second, it tries too hard.
Third, I see no methodology.
June 30, 2025 at 1:22 AM
Why thank you!
I appreciate the invitation. Very thoughtful of you!
May 3, 2025 at 4:43 AM
After all, considering purely the temporal sense of the context, courtrooms are places of ritual.
May 2, 2025 at 7:00 AM
Ah! There's an easy answer to your query: no thinking at all. It was a scrivener's error on my part. I meant to conjugate it and mistakenly didn't.

I appreciate the correction! My knowledge of Interlingua on a good day is superficial.
May 2, 2025 at 6:45 AM
(In order:
- Latin
- Latin [without inflection]
- Interlingua
- Esperanto
- English )
April 26, 2025 at 8:24 PM