No surprise fantasy and sci-fi have high overlap.

I’m surprised by the high agreeableness in action.

I think ineffability is often a key part of awe. I push back on the Wittgensteinian notation that language is the limit of our understanding. In fact, Wittgenstein himself reneged on that in his follow up work.

And, you don’t need an indigenous studies degree to appreciate the need for forests.

I think you are too stuck on this “economic motives” thing to see my point.

STEM and “economic motives” are not one and the same. Remember that the Communists have had some great science and technology.

Just think - if Picasso never produced art, how different would the world look? Now imagine if the washing machine was never invented.

I’m thinking about actual quality of life benefit. The fact is that the vast majority of quality of life benefits are because of technological advancement, not from social, artistic, or indigenous studies.