layerfmri.bsky.social
@layerfmri.bsky.social
I try to collect talks, papers, and news regarding layer-fMRI. Focusing on acquisition.
https://researchers.mgh.harvard.edu/profile/42655591/Renzo-Huber
3/3
November 4, 2025 at 9:28 PM
2/3
November 4, 2025 at 9:28 PM
2/2
Häkkinen et al., investigated how to push layer-fMRI VASO at the next-Gen 7T (Feinbergatron) 7T scanner for layer-specific circuitry mapping. The fast gradients reveal temporal dynamics and connectivity with the cortex.
doi.org/10.1101/2025...
September 8, 2025 at 12:04 PM
This thread reminds me on a satirical Blog post on this issue.
layerfmri.com/the-best-seq...

Maybe this one fits best here on the topic of bing noisy.
September 2, 2025 at 12:49 PM
Thanks. I am glad we agree that the replication discussion was not about VASO then.

Kenshu Koiso (movies + newly faces/places), Insub Kim (orientation), Daniel Haenelt (ODC) compared MVPA across contrasts. Their results agree with you on vein effects in MVPA BOLD.

No 🌌 left, DM 4 🔗.
September 2, 2025 at 12:43 PM
Fully agree. There was a slide on one of the layer-fMRI educationals at OHBM trying to get an overview of the layer field.
Attention (or what people call it to be) seems to be the least reproducible effect in the field.
September 2, 2025 at 12:38 PM
It's not so easy.
It depends, if reduced sensitivity is coming from removing fasle-positive vein signals. VASOs sensitivity to micro vessels is not bad and often used for MVPA
Wasn't the replication issue in that study discussed wrt segmentation issues. If at all, VASO's T1 contrast helps with that
September 1, 2025 at 2:39 PM
Reposted
Hence use VASO :-)
August 31, 2025 at 6:56 PM