Laura Stephen
@laurastephen.bsky.social
The other alternative isn't really a great defense either which is they are being run by some sort of agency which pays people pennies to scour the web for content to repost without credit
Neither of these scenarios are positive or worth protecting.
Neither of these scenarios are positive or worth protecting.
December 8, 2025 at 11:24 AM
The other alternative isn't really a great defense either which is they are being run by some sort of agency which pays people pennies to scour the web for content to repost without credit
Neither of these scenarios are positive or worth protecting.
Neither of these scenarios are positive or worth protecting.
It doesn't have super suspicious videos because the quality of AI videos is now very good. This means that if my assertion is correct and they are an AI video account, that they are using the most modern models.
December 8, 2025 at 11:22 AM
It doesn't have super suspicious videos because the quality of AI videos is now very good. This means that if my assertion is correct and they are an AI video account, that they are using the most modern models.
You should definitely do due diligence before asserting fakery That said approaching viral videos with skepticism when you don't already trust the source is sensible because a significant proportion of surprising videos like this are now AI generated rather than stolen from someone else
December 8, 2025 at 11:18 AM
You should definitely do due diligence before asserting fakery That said approaching viral videos with skepticism when you don't already trust the source is sensible because a significant proportion of surprising videos like this are now AI generated rather than stolen from someone else
Unfortunately the most recent set of video and image AI models are so good that it can be hard to tell without being skeptical and none of us like to admit we have been scammed so it is natural to look for reasons why we haven't. Videos without source at this point have to be considered suspicious
December 8, 2025 at 7:55 AM
Unfortunately the most recent set of video and image AI models are so good that it can be hard to tell without being skeptical and none of us like to admit we have been scammed so it is natural to look for reasons why we haven't. Videos without source at this point have to be considered suspicious
www.instagram.com/showtoolsai?.... Is great on insta and tiktok for tells. This account doesn't have very suspicious videos but they are suspicious I inadvertently paused the second video which looked like bad model interpolation in a video game because the two dogs were merged into one another
Instagram
Create an account or log in to Instagram - Share what you're into with the people who get you.
www.instagram.com
December 8, 2025 at 7:54 AM
www.instagram.com/showtoolsai?.... Is great on insta and tiktok for tells. This account doesn't have very suspicious videos but they are suspicious I inadvertently paused the second video which looked like bad model interpolation in a video game because the two dogs were merged into one another
If you look at rest of the videos on that YouTube account, it is clearly an AI slip account. For this one, the physics of the cat falling out was the most suspect to me there are other videos that if you pause them, you get very clear artifacts youtu.be/xdjNrhAVRDI?... is a good example
Puppy gets upset after the dog takes its bone in Jiangsu, China
YouTube video by VBear media
youtu.be
December 8, 2025 at 6:54 AM
If you look at rest of the videos on that YouTube account, it is clearly an AI slip account. For this one, the physics of the cat falling out was the most suspect to me there are other videos that if you pause them, you get very clear artifacts youtu.be/xdjNrhAVRDI?... is a good example
To be fair, in the current age, that might not be a real photo but a AI generated image to fit the narrative they want to push
November 30, 2025 at 1:56 PM
To be fair, in the current age, that might not be a real photo but a AI generated image to fit the narrative they want to push
More shocking cruelty from our current government. The £15 million quoted is an average of £143 a year per person transport costs which given they always have to use public transport or taxis is not particularly unreasonable
November 29, 2025 at 8:07 AM
More shocking cruelty from our current government. The £15 million quoted is an average of £143 a year per person transport costs which given they always have to use public transport or taxis is not particularly unreasonable
Reposted by Laura Stephen
Her parents bought the house in the 1960s for £21K and now it's worth £1.2 million
It is insane that some people think you should just be able to keep all of that - if you've made a big profit, it is fair you should get taxed on that
It is insane that some people think you should just be able to keep all of that - if you've made a big profit, it is fair you should get taxed on that
I don't think this was actually deliberately published as ragebait, but the entitlement contained within is remarkable and a classic example of the sort of sentiment governments sometimes just have to face down inews.co.uk/inews-lifest...?
November 24, 2025 at 11:13 AM
Congratulations, what an amazing achievement
November 14, 2025 at 12:56 PM
Congratulations, what an amazing achievement
To be fair, for me it is salt or sugar, the carrier probably needs to be simple if I am so hungry I Iack decision making capacity but it will be one of those or both at the same time
November 8, 2025 at 11:25 PM
To be fair, for me it is salt or sugar, the carrier probably needs to be simple if I am so hungry I Iack decision making capacity but it will be one of those or both at the same time