It's quite easy to automatate sitting on your fat arse counting your money, occasionally interrupting that to comitt adultery with the CHRO tbf.

Unless you are a facist of course.

Most people advocating for Palestinian lives weren't strategists nor a singular movement. They saw a genocide happening and tried to stop it. That's it. I think it'd be bad if everyone in the world cynically calculated public strategy every time they saw something bad happening.

Perhaps if someone made an explainer video

It's a question that has been asked and answered many times before, though. Zionism (the campaign for a Jewish ethnostate) leads to murderous racism because that's what campaigns for ethnostates always do. It's a pretty comprehensively discredited ideology by this point.

we should be throwing the ambassador out of the fucking country not rolling out the red carpet, absolute disgrace.

This is genuinely embarrassing
Labour are a national embarrassment

at least it own the libs tho.

haha, what a loser.

it would be great if they did ban banter tbh. mediocre, dull shite.

yeah, it's made a difference of -25% to their standing in the polls in 18 months.

Isn't this the wife beater?

Laugh at Disturbed frontman David Draiman’s pathetic instagram account.

lol, what a load of tripe.

It's wrong. The Times didn't advise Starmer to not be able to get the support of his own party despite a monster majority and climb down in humiliating fashion after weeks of bad press.

The original post that I think you agree with is about the Times and their 'hypocritical' response.

But the original post which it appears you agree with is accusing the Times of hypocrisy. It's not hypocritical to believe what passed yesterday wasn't the bill that the Times was saying Starmer needed to stay the course on.