sound like

guy who only bets against the market makes big bet against the market does not sway me here. pltr has been aching for a reality check regardless of environment. amzn and goog just had positive earnings. and if nvda crushes it next week the jitters will subside again.

i thought of it first is all i’m saying

Our senses light up at the perception of a simulacrum, but they barely flicker when presented with historical evidence. “This symbol we can all see means y, therefore x” is much easier to rationalize than “these a actions over b time period means c, therefore x”.

Simulacra in the hyperreal have more salience and immediacy than material within in the real. Perceptions of signification appear more palpable and violent than real violence that takes place outside of perception.

To enlist in an era of fascist hysteria is to do fascist violence. That is real—but forgiven—because the coercion of young men in the US to join the military is immediate. We bestow them with innocence.

So why is a simulacrum imbued with historical fascist violence treated differently?

There is far more to glean from one’s accumulated and expressed ideas and actions (particularly without the foreknowledge of future scrutiny) than a simulacrum of dead political organization.

An individual in a position to further the left’s material aim is denounced for a simulacrum divorced from its origin through the dialectical processes of political violence and economics of death.

the exception to the Ruel

cream?

we place our esophagi in god’s hands

name?

bird resp—

got it

and a banger no less

give me comfy oversized sweatshirts or give me death