Anyone who has actual experience with the LLM technology that people are erroneously referring to as “AI” knows this is largely fictitious on both ends. In reality it’s just enabling more efficiency, and thus creating more demand for labor due to productivity logjams in existing work streams.

This is nothing but a financial handout to Big Poultice.

Same tariffs as Trump, same tariffs as Biden, or a weirder third thing 🤨?

Case in point: this person is a dyed-in-the-wool online socialist.

Yeah, but that wouldn’t be funny. A guy getting harassed for having a Cybertruck is hilarious, amiright?! I mean we’re approaching sweeps week for Christ sake.

There aren’t enough quality troll poasts like this on here…designed to piss ALL the people off at the SAME time. Reminds me of those glory days of Twitter. 🥹

Yes, I feel like when he went on Rogan to discuss his work on Psychedelics it was something of a bellwether moment where a significant portion of that stuff got accepted or gained traction among a cohort it was hitherto dismissed by.

This feels like a National Lampoon movie from the late 70s where the rich kids are against “cooler” rich kids, and it’s somehow supposed to be a lesson about class struggle…or something?

Feel like I was saying from day one against proclamations of US being shadow governed by a billionaire that ultimately the power balance tilts heavily towards the government. Musk is powerful alright and influential but in the end he serves at the pleasure of the executive, not the other way around.

"I'm a firm believer in our First Amendment right, but I also believe that our Founding Fathers did not include in the First Amendment as being able to lie about somebody," Moyle said. Apparently this guy has never heard of the Jefferson vs Adams presidential election.

The whole thread is great. Though use of the term “glowie” seems sus for an actual fed.

A tax-funded social safety net is “socialism”?

men who dressed like this from 1980 - 1990 were stock villains in National Lampoon movies and talked like George Plimpton

I’m unclear as to whether he addressed this specific issue or not from the article and to the extent that there would be “conditions” if one of them would be to remove the cap and require risk-prone homes to seek a private insurer?

Whenever I see these “banned books” lists, I’m pretty confounded because I could swear I literally saw a bunch of these in a bookstore like…a few weeks ago.