Klemens Jo
banner
klemensjo.bsky.social
Klemens Jo
@klemensjo.bsky.social
Pro-life messages and rebuttals, ideas on morality, and thoughts on Bluesky
I can't find a good overview link but you can look up his work on birthmarks and also past-life memories among children (work carried on by his colleague Jim Tucker, following Stevenson's death).
October 25, 2025 at 10:44 AM
That's what it sounds like: I don't want it and it can't stop me so it's okay.
October 21, 2025 at 6:23 PM
Abortion is a woman not only announcing but enacting oppressive power on the most vulnerable and innocent. That is most certainly not a right.
October 21, 2025 at 6:03 PM
It is a child. Yes I'm keen on human beings not being killed.
October 21, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Might makes right
October 21, 2025 at 6:01 PM
Morality is all about agreeing general rules for everyone's business.
October 6, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Ian Stevenson has shown that consciousness survives the physical body. AI will become conscious like us only when our minds will be able to plug into it.
October 6, 2025 at 2:08 PM
So do you think it's bad in all other circumstances? I'm glad that we agree.

By the way, a child cannot survive an ectopic pregnancy so there's no moral quandary there.
October 6, 2025 at 2:01 PM
How did Western culture end up here, with the idea that it is a legitimate expression of freedom and the proof of equality for a woman to be able to kill her own child. A depraved and broken society, I'm afraid.
October 3, 2025 at 6:51 AM
A foetus can only be said to be non-viable when it's been removed. Killing it in the womb can't prove its non-viability. C-sections and vaginal delivery are preferred because a) they're quicker b) less chance of infection c) the baby is given a chance. The mother likely hopes the child can survive.
October 3, 2025 at 6:50 AM
The greater the use of contraception the greater the 'need' for abortion. This is quite obvious. A better society would be fighting to reduce abortions because no woman goes into a relationship wanting an abortion.
October 3, 2025 at 6:49 AM
The names of abortion pills within a heart and stuck on the wall as something to be proud of...extraordinary. Love does not equal killing.
October 3, 2025 at 6:47 AM
Not sure if true but one can only hope that this might one day happen and all human beings' lives can be protected and valued.
October 3, 2025 at 6:47 AM
The right to life must be extended to all human beings across the United States and across the world. Only then can anyone truly say their lives have value.
October 3, 2025 at 6:46 AM
outraging conservatives and killing the unborn.
October 3, 2025 at 6:44 AM
Abortion/birth can likewise be seen as a metaphor for immigration and to what extent we welcome the weak and vulnerable even if it costs us something.
October 3, 2025 at 6:43 AM
Healthcare is the opposite of abortion. You are so far on the wrong side of history you can't even see the dividing line with a Hubble telescope.
October 3, 2025 at 6:42 AM
Why in the 21st century are we still doing these barbaric things? Our ignorance is only matched by our abuse of power.
October 3, 2025 at 6:42 AM
Why? How about we don't kill human beings.
October 3, 2025 at 6:41 AM
'Post-birth abortion' is where a child is either killed or allowed to die if born during a failed abortion. It's been documented to have happened and not just a couple of times. It is only because you are blind to the immorality of abortion that you can't conceive that sth like this can happen.
October 3, 2025 at 6:40 AM
Given that exceptions for the mother's life exist do you agree that women are not being killed by abortion laws?
October 3, 2025 at 6:36 AM
I guess therefore that the chart is wrong throughout.
October 3, 2025 at 6:34 AM
As a test I looked up Mississippi's abortion law and they do allow for life-saving care for the mother and yet on your link it says there are "none stated" (exceptions). Same for Texas, whose law I have read. They have an exception but your chart says "none stated".
October 3, 2025 at 6:34 AM
It's not necessarily relevant but there are trans-supporting bits in the Gospels, not that they're right either.
October 3, 2025 at 6:29 AM
I choose to follow science and logic. That normally works well. There's no guarantee that one's conscious thoughts reflects the subconscious; the definition does not match your or general trans claims.
October 3, 2025 at 6:27 AM