@cos.io I can fix this for you

What do you think of 5, 6 and 9?

Small factual correction, you said France is Bacon but it's a country.

I think Sokka is underutilized

This, too, is Stancilism

People will smirk along approvingly at this post and then go on to crucify Matt Darling for posting data.

What's the best Christmas hymn

Kubrick was killed because someone watched any of his movies and made the right choice.

The real stoker meta is to land a 3x on "lair of the white worm"

Thank you Stephen Lang for being in the Don't Breathe movies because they're great in cine2nerdle battles.

"Why do you fight the vibecession when Trump is in power, don't you want to win???"

Cause once you start believing untrue shit, it's just a short hop to falling for the shitbirds.

It matters if things are true.

A complementary pathology is that there's the perception that erring on the side of being too naive is somehow far worse than erring on the side of being too cynical, despite the fact that overly cynical predictions are wrong *all the fucking time*, wrong in just as consequential ways too!

It's going to rule

Crucifixion

I do think a lot of them genuinely don't know he's not Matt Yglesias

I think people shouldn't be goddamn freaks about it.

No, the problem is in the bad faith readers

None of your tirade explains the glee people got out of reading Matt in bad faith; a technical disagreement doesn't lead to that.