I can't believe the framers didn't include that in the constitution!
November 21, 2025 at 6:58 PM
I can't believe the framers didn't include that in the constitution!
NYT: the president responded negatively following suggestions that troops should not follow illegal orders. He disagreed robustly with the line taken by some democratic congress members.
November 21, 2025 at 11:30 AM
NYT: the president responded negatively following suggestions that troops should not follow illegal orders. He disagreed robustly with the line taken by some democratic congress members.
Trump can't be trusted.
Putin certainly can't be trusted.
And for Ukraine, experience has shown that western security guarantees cannot be trusted.
Putin certainly can't be trusted.
And for Ukraine, experience has shown that western security guarantees cannot be trusted.
November 21, 2025 at 11:21 AM
Trump can't be trusted.
Putin certainly can't be trusted.
And for Ukraine, experience has shown that western security guarantees cannot be trusted.
Putin certainly can't be trusted.
And for Ukraine, experience has shown that western security guarantees cannot be trusted.
Noooo, Jadzia! Very upsetting episode. I am also a fan of Ezri, however, so not all bad!
November 21, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Noooo, Jadzia! Very upsetting episode. I am also a fan of Ezri, however, so not all bad!
Russia neither comprehends, nor cares to comprehend, the meaning of the word 'peace'.
November 20, 2025 at 11:13 PM
Russia neither comprehends, nor cares to comprehend, the meaning of the word 'peace'.
Nice to see that partisanship has its limits!
November 20, 2025 at 12:26 PM
Nice to see that partisanship has its limits!
That's a very short sleep!
November 20, 2025 at 12:25 PM
That's a very short sleep!
Alienating their core support while trying to attract daily mail readers who will Never vote labour - this is not a recipe for success.
It's not even working for the tories, who are much more palleatable for the RW bigots.
It's not even working for the tories, who are much more palleatable for the RW bigots.
November 20, 2025 at 12:24 PM
Alienating their core support while trying to attract daily mail readers who will Never vote labour - this is not a recipe for success.
It's not even working for the tories, who are much more palleatable for the RW bigots.
It's not even working for the tories, who are much more palleatable for the RW bigots.
Extra points for pee-related puns!
November 20, 2025 at 12:16 PM
Extra points for pee-related puns!
They are utterly deplorable.
November 18, 2025 at 9:14 PM
They are utterly deplorable.
Labour don't understand how their words and actions are only strengthening the reform threat. They are absolutely clueless, as well as nasty.
November 18, 2025 at 9:07 AM
Labour don't understand how their words and actions are only strengthening the reform threat. They are absolutely clueless, as well as nasty.
Have they taken out a contract on you?! Great picture.
November 17, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Have they taken out a contract on you?! Great picture.
The correct answer to that question is "NO".
Only a few knuckle-dragging patriot flagshaggers would want to see that. WTF is wrong with Starmer? He has a strong mandate for positive change and a large commons majority, and this is the best he can do.
Only a few knuckle-dragging patriot flagshaggers would want to see that. WTF is wrong with Starmer? He has a strong mandate for positive change and a large commons majority, and this is the best he can do.
November 17, 2025 at 5:23 PM
The correct answer to that question is "NO".
Only a few knuckle-dragging patriot flagshaggers would want to see that. WTF is wrong with Starmer? He has a strong mandate for positive change and a large commons majority, and this is the best he can do.
Only a few knuckle-dragging patriot flagshaggers would want to see that. WTF is wrong with Starmer? He has a strong mandate for positive change and a large commons majority, and this is the best he can do.
Not sure the poor old Babadook deserves to be lumped in with all those evil abominations!
November 17, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Not sure the poor old Babadook deserves to be lumped in with all those evil abominations!
A very odd understanding of the desirability of Britain. We are certainly a long way from 'Great'.
November 17, 2025 at 4:29 PM
A very odd understanding of the desirability of Britain. We are certainly a long way from 'Great'.
You must be absolutely devastated that your party is finally in power and yet behaving worse than the tory shambles that preceeded it. What is your leadership thinking? They have completely lost it, and are blowing their chance to fix and remake Britain.
November 17, 2025 at 4:26 PM
You must be absolutely devastated that your party is finally in power and yet behaving worse than the tory shambles that preceeded it. What is your leadership thinking? They have completely lost it, and are blowing their chance to fix and remake Britain.