Dylan Miles
@kingofbob.bsky.social
The same guy you know and love and/or hate from the bird app.
Where did i change subjects? You asked me who at the DNC I was talking about and I told you: Ken Martin.
What facts did you ask for which i did not give?
I dont even know what point you're trying to make.
What facts did you ask for which i did not give?
I dont even know what point you're trying to make.
June 16, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Where did i change subjects? You asked me who at the DNC I was talking about and I told you: Ken Martin.
What facts did you ask for which i did not give?
I dont even know what point you're trying to make.
What facts did you ask for which i did not give?
I dont even know what point you're trying to make.
Its not my fault you cant see my original post on the subject. And even in that post, I talk about how the central issue is the influence of the rich.
You should take your own advice. By your screen cap, you do not have all the facts.
You should take your own advice. By your screen cap, you do not have all the facts.
June 16, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Its not my fault you cant see my original post on the subject. And even in that post, I talk about how the central issue is the influence of the rich.
You should take your own advice. By your screen cap, you do not have all the facts.
You should take your own advice. By your screen cap, you do not have all the facts.
My original argument was literally that the DNC serves the donors. Where do you believe I changed topics?
June 16, 2025 at 7:00 PM
My original argument was literally that the DNC serves the donors. Where do you believe I changed topics?
Fascists always assume they'll never be the victim of the system they helped create.
June 16, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Fascists always assume they'll never be the victim of the system they helped create.
It's not my fault you can't be bothered to follow the conversation.
My argument has always been that the DNC puts donors wants first. That minorities are an ancillary concern for the party at best.
Ken Martin is not a minority. So why do you keep banging on about that?
My argument has always been that the DNC puts donors wants first. That minorities are an ancillary concern for the party at best.
Ken Martin is not a minority. So why do you keep banging on about that?
a colorful sticker that says be honest on a purple background
ALT: a colorful sticker that says be honest on a purple background
media.tenor.com
June 16, 2025 at 6:38 PM
It's not my fault you can't be bothered to follow the conversation.
My argument has always been that the DNC puts donors wants first. That minorities are an ancillary concern for the party at best.
Ken Martin is not a minority. So why do you keep banging on about that?
My argument has always been that the DNC puts donors wants first. That minorities are an ancillary concern for the party at best.
Ken Martin is not a minority. So why do you keep banging on about that?
So your argument is that you have to give Democrats super majorities forever, or there's nothing they can do?
Do you understand what a mark you sound like right now?
Do you understand what a mark you sound like right now?
June 16, 2025 at 6:27 PM
So your argument is that you have to give Democrats super majorities forever, or there's nothing they can do?
Do you understand what a mark you sound like right now?
Do you understand what a mark you sound like right now?
And this isn't an apology for anything. He never even mentions the crime bill directly.
June 16, 2025 at 6:25 PM
And this isn't an apology for anything. He never even mentions the crime bill directly.
That apology doesn't say what you think it does. He talks about "working with segregationists" but doesn't mention his own segregationist views. He in fact implies he opposed them on the issue of segregation.
Might want to read your sources first.
Might want to read your sources first.
June 16, 2025 at 6:22 PM
That apology doesn't say what you think it does. He talks about "working with segregationists" but doesn't mention his own segregationist views. He in fact implies he opposed them on the issue of segregation.
Might want to read your sources first.
Might want to read your sources first.
Okay. Demonstrate Joe Biden's change for me. Has he ever even renounced his views as Wallace did?
Relying on the black vote to win elections doesn't qualify.
Relying on the black vote to win elections doesn't qualify.
June 16, 2025 at 6:12 PM
Okay. Demonstrate Joe Biden's change for me. Has he ever even renounced his views as Wallace did?
Relying on the black vote to win elections doesn't qualify.
Relying on the black vote to win elections doesn't qualify.
Not sure where you think I said anything positive about the GOP.
I don't expect perfection. I expect consistency. And neither Democrats, nor their diehard voters, have any.
I don't expect perfection. I expect consistency. And neither Democrats, nor their diehard voters, have any.
June 16, 2025 at 6:09 PM
Not sure where you think I said anything positive about the GOP.
I don't expect perfection. I expect consistency. And neither Democrats, nor their diehard voters, have any.
I don't expect perfection. I expect consistency. And neither Democrats, nor their diehard voters, have any.
JFC... And liberals wonder why it's impossible to take you all seriously. This argument is circular.
Who do you believe is going to revise those laws? The politicians who take money from billionaires and then serve their interests? Come on.
Who do you believe is going to revise those laws? The politicians who take money from billionaires and then serve their interests? Come on.
a man is sitting on a couch and saying " i need you to take this seriously "
ALT: a man is sitting on a couch and saying " i need you to take this seriously "
media.tenor.com
June 16, 2025 at 6:04 PM
JFC... And liberals wonder why it's impossible to take you all seriously. This argument is circular.
Who do you believe is going to revise those laws? The politicians who take money from billionaires and then serve their interests? Come on.
Who do you believe is going to revise those laws? The politicians who take money from billionaires and then serve their interests? Come on.
So easy you refuse to do so? Why? Why waste both our times *not* answering the question if you could in a post or two?
a woman with a tattoo on her arm is asking what 's the point
ALT: a woman with a tattoo on her arm is asking what 's the point
media.tenor.com
June 16, 2025 at 6:01 PM
So easy you refuse to do so? Why? Why waste both our times *not* answering the question if you could in a post or two?
Can you rephrase that question so it makes sense in the context of this conversation?
I'm highlighting that the DNC is captured by capital. Since my argument is that the DNC pays lip service to minorities for votes, without actually representing their interests in office.
I'm highlighting that the DNC is captured by capital. Since my argument is that the DNC pays lip service to minorities for votes, without actually representing their interests in office.
June 16, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Can you rephrase that question so it makes sense in the context of this conversation?
I'm highlighting that the DNC is captured by capital. Since my argument is that the DNC pays lip service to minorities for votes, without actually representing their interests in office.
I'm highlighting that the DNC is captured by capital. Since my argument is that the DNC pays lip service to minorities for votes, without actually representing their interests in office.
These are methodology questions, not end goal questions.
June 16, 2025 at 5:50 PM
These are methodology questions, not end goal questions.
Why didn't you answer my questions?
I don't believe you can take over the party. Which is why I'm asking you to explain how you're going to do it.
I didn't say it's inevitable. But surely you have some way to prevent it?
I don't believe you can take over the party. Which is why I'm asking you to explain how you're going to do it.
I didn't say it's inevitable. But surely you have some way to prevent it?
June 16, 2025 at 5:26 PM
Why didn't you answer my questions?
I don't believe you can take over the party. Which is why I'm asking you to explain how you're going to do it.
I didn't say it's inevitable. But surely you have some way to prevent it?
I don't believe you can take over the party. Which is why I'm asking you to explain how you're going to do it.
I didn't say it's inevitable. But surely you have some way to prevent it?
Let's start with the guy who talked about "good billionaires" immediately after he was given the chair position.
June 16, 2025 at 5:23 PM
Let's start with the guy who talked about "good billionaires" immediately after he was given the chair position.
Genuine question: How do you plan to take over the party when capitalists control the top positions?
How do you ensure these people you're putting in don't end up captured by capital like establishment Democrats?
How do you ensure these people you're putting in don't end up captured by capital like establishment Democrats?
June 16, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Genuine question: How do you plan to take over the party when capitalists control the top positions?
How do you ensure these people you're putting in don't end up captured by capital like establishment Democrats?
How do you ensure these people you're putting in don't end up captured by capital like establishment Democrats?
The party itself, the movers and shakers who actually run the show and are not elected by anyone, is captured by capital. Which means the entire structure is.
I'm not talking about voters. I'm talking about the party. You need to learn to make the distinction.
I'm not talking about voters. I'm talking about the party. You need to learn to make the distinction.
June 16, 2025 at 5:11 PM
The party itself, the movers and shakers who actually run the show and are not elected by anyone, is captured by capital. Which means the entire structure is.
I'm not talking about voters. I'm talking about the party. You need to learn to make the distinction.
I'm not talking about voters. I'm talking about the party. You need to learn to make the distinction.
Warren and Sanders are both sellouts.
Anyone on the actual left has no problem saying this.
Anyone on the actual left has no problem saying this.
June 16, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Warren and Sanders are both sellouts.
Anyone on the actual left has no problem saying this.
Anyone on the actual left has no problem saying this.
Biden was literally a segregationist. You know that, right? Why would you back someone who historically has actively opposed your liberation from white supremacist systems?
June 16, 2025 at 5:09 PM
Biden was literally a segregationist. You know that, right? Why would you back someone who historically has actively opposed your liberation from white supremacist systems?
It's not about how many votes billionaires get. It's about the favors the politicians promise in return.
The DNC doesn't care about minorities, except in so far as they can be exploited for votes by simple lip service.
The DNC doesn't care about minorities, except in so far as they can be exploited for votes by simple lip service.
June 16, 2025 at 5:07 PM
It's not about how many votes billionaires get. It's about the favors the politicians promise in return.
The DNC doesn't care about minorities, except in so far as they can be exploited for votes by simple lip service.
The DNC doesn't care about minorities, except in so far as they can be exploited for votes by simple lip service.
Is it though? Seems like a waste of time trying to change a party captured by capital.
I think we're better served by waking folks up to the fact that the political class doesn't work for us.
But you do you.
I think we're better served by waking folks up to the fact that the political class doesn't work for us.
But you do you.
a man with a beard is sitting on a couch with the words have at it behind him
ALT: a man with a beard is sitting on a couch with the words have at it behind him
media.tenor.com
June 16, 2025 at 5:05 PM
Is it though? Seems like a waste of time trying to change a party captured by capital.
I think we're better served by waking folks up to the fact that the political class doesn't work for us.
But you do you.
I think we're better served by waking folks up to the fact that the political class doesn't work for us.
But you do you.