Ha. Thanks for the thoughts! À dark room is on my list of stuff. However, it’s a long list… 😆🤦🏻‍♂️

Argh. These were done by a lab — I don't have gear for any part of the process. Fortunately, I'm not too precious about this roll.

😊🙏🏻

Thanks! 🙏🏻☺️

Thanks! 🙏🏻☺️

Thanks, Victoria. All messages of support are greatly appreciated.

"On safari, cosplaying as a journalist."

Who knows, but that kinda misses the point. Abuse, addiction, and disabilities can lead to diminished responsibility which is then easy to exploit. Plus, that doesn't change the fact that the image is used out of context.

Personally I'd like 'work' to get me closer to the subject via the 'artist' not distance me from them. I have strong feelings about exploitative work by photographers. I wonder how many prospective masterclass attendees realise they too are being exploited...

From the comments: "We shouldn't be surprised that the type of customer that can afford a $15000 lens and a $10,000 camera body might not have much sympathy for the poor."

fstoppers.com/opinion/woul... Using images out of context is one thing. Using images that are clearly exploitative as part of your marketing is something else.

Glad you enjoyed it and thanks for sharing. :)

100% agree. This is precisely what is pushing me to shoot more film.