Donkey Katz, Esquiggle
@katzd.bsky.social
Twitter Refugee. Competitive troll slayer. Very strong views on what’s fair, reasonable, and non discriminatory.
I first read this as “crime is legal if you do it with swords” and was hoping it was about trial by ordeal
January 11, 2026 at 1:55 AM
I first read this as “crime is legal if you do it with swords” and was hoping it was about trial by ordeal
Isn’t that what Booker did?
January 6, 2026 at 12:27 AM
Isn’t that what Booker did?
That’s not Marco Rubio!
January 4, 2026 at 1:47 AM
That’s not Marco Rubio!
Alternating between days of 200 very carefully selected words and 10k words.
December 30, 2025 at 11:10 PM
Alternating between days of 200 very carefully selected words and 10k words.
Also, professors who can leave will.
December 26, 2025 at 10:21 PM
Also, professors who can leave will.
Onion futures are a federal crime
December 26, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Onion futures are a federal crime
Run you fucking fools
December 26, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Run you fucking fools
Alternate theory: men with junk issues issue junk bonds
December 25, 2025 at 11:49 PM
Alternate theory: men with junk issues issue junk bonds
Causation or correlation 😂😂😂
December 25, 2025 at 11:45 PM
Causation or correlation 😂😂😂
Disagree, I am pretty sure he isn’t even in the bottom 3.
December 25, 2025 at 11:32 PM
Disagree, I am pretty sure he isn’t even in the bottom 3.
If the grad student had been the conservative here, they would have a career as a commentator at Fox News till the day they died
December 24, 2025 at 4:47 PM
If the grad student had been the conservative here, they would have a career as a commentator at Fox News till the day they died
Agreed, though I think the compromises of articles 7 and 8 of TRIPS is a significant problem with BHS. My understanding is TRIPS wasn’t argued by the parties in BHS so the ECJ did not consider it.
December 17, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Agreed, though I think the compromises of articles 7 and 8 of TRIPS is a significant problem with BHS. My understanding is TRIPS wasn’t argued by the parties in BHS so the ECJ did not consider it.
I think it is contrary to the territoriality principles that form the basis of the international patent ordering.
December 17, 2025 at 7:58 PM
I think it is contrary to the territoriality principles that form the basis of the international patent ordering.
You two are too cool
December 16, 2025 at 1:38 PM
You two are too cool
It looks like they all skipped leg day.
December 11, 2025 at 1:27 PM
It looks like they all skipped leg day.
It’s a world where each antitrust market has a DeBeers
December 9, 2025 at 3:28 AM
It’s a world where each antitrust market has a DeBeers
That’s not fair. Leaving poor Disney out all alone.
December 9, 2025 at 3:24 AM
That’s not fair. Leaving poor Disney out all alone.
Also how I sext
November 11, 2025 at 7:39 PM
Also how I sext
Patent courts in Germany are issuing ex parte anti contract enforcement injunctions to preserve hypothetical infringement jurisdiction. It’s wild.
November 9, 2025 at 6:31 PM
Patent courts in Germany are issuing ex parte anti contract enforcement injunctions to preserve hypothetical infringement jurisdiction. It’s wild.
Not here, but it is a thing in Germany and WD Texas
November 9, 2025 at 6:22 PM
Not here, but it is a thing in Germany and WD Texas
What’s crazy are the judges that market their jurisdictions to plaintiffs.
November 9, 2025 at 5:36 PM
What’s crazy are the judges that market their jurisdictions to plaintiffs.
I thought you were talking about the president, not the airport. Thought it was a bit extreme.
November 5, 2025 at 4:13 PM
I thought you were talking about the president, not the airport. Thought it was a bit extreme.
This part also blew me away:
November 4, 2025 at 9:42 AM
This part also blew me away: