Katy Pearce
katypearce.bsky.social
Katy Pearce
@katypearce.bsky.social
Associate Prof @uwcomm. I study tech & inequality in 🇦🇲 & 🇦🇿. Posts research & pop culture & parenting. She/her.
I did replace the Ioanes with @taylorlorenz.bsky.social last fall, to tie in with the broader 'age verification' theme.
January 2, 2026 at 6:56 PM
What an odd thing.
December 24, 2025 at 5:32 PM
WaPo picked up on what was happening 2+ years ago!
December 13, 2025 at 5:00 AM
I glanced at this (unopened, just subject line) and saw The End of Organization, @davekarpf.bsky.social
December 9, 2025 at 5:54 PM
My brain is split between Katseye and grading.
December 9, 2025 at 1:30 AM
Wow. Chatgpt is now making suggestions like this.
December 8, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Sometimes the internet is good.
November 30, 2025 at 7:00 AM
I don't cite newspapers often, so just out of curiosity I asked asked ChatGPT for the APA citation of this (I'll obv go to OWL Purdue). And I knew IMMEDIATELY it was wrong. OMG.
November 25, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Toy sizes are complicated.
November 23, 2025 at 7:37 PM
November 19, 2025 at 12:50 AM
Google Wallet is bringing in numbers and codes from Gmail. 🤔 (So of corse I don't know which is which family members').
November 18, 2025 at 5:58 PM
I'm not the first person to search this, I'm sure.
November 17, 2025 at 2:17 AM
Props for tomorrow!
November 16, 2025 at 6:45 PM
And, as usual, you click on "view/edit" to paste your review in to the field. You can also click on the overall ID to put your comments in there. And don't forget to save it! #ICA26
November 15, 2025 at 7:31 PM
#ICA26 but with these pre-formed panels "Session Proposals" - they are NOT anonymized. To see the names of the people proposing/chairing it, make the "Chair/Discussant" column wider.
November 15, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Another #ICA26 reviewing tip. FYI: You MIGHT be reviewing pre-formed session proposals! But they aren't in the same place as regular papers.
This is the left side of the Reviewing screen and you'll need to click on Session Proposals.
In @icacat.bsky.social we email to warn people, but YMMV.
November 15, 2025 at 6:59 PM
But the BEST way to read those choice is to make the "Recommendation Code" column BIGGER #ICA26
November 15, 2025 at 6:54 PM
If you make your screen view smaller, they can be slightly easier to read. #ICA26
November 15, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Also, if you REJECT a submission, YOU MUST SELECT A REASON. This is true even if you had an extensive written review. However, the rejection reasons are hard to read!
#ICA26
November 15, 2025 at 6:54 PM
It is also easier to click on this green thing to make the window bigger. #ICA26
November 15, 2025 at 6:54 PM
You can hover over for the full text of the sentence. #ICA26
November 15, 2025 at 6:54 PM
A little ScholarOne tip for #ICA26.
The review choices look like this initially:
November 15, 2025 at 6:54 PM
November 15, 2025 at 6:24 PM
My least favorite ScholarOne feature is that I pasted in my review, it "saved" but rejected it quietly, showed me this, making me THINK that it saved, but when I click on it again, it is empty. #ICA26
November 15, 2025 at 6:08 PM
The saga continues.
November 15, 2025 at 6:05 PM