Dr. Kasey Aderhold
@kaseyaderhold.bsky.social
Earthquake seismologist (she/her) in Alaska. Works at EarthScope. My views are my own.
See network map here: earthquake.alaska.edu/network
July 3, 2025 at 9:50 PM
See network map here: earthquake.alaska.edu/network
Darn, there are seismic stations out there (with Vaisalas on them) but real time data is down. Hopefully they are still recording data on site.
July 3, 2025 at 7:14 PM
Darn, there are seismic stations out there (with Vaisalas on them) but real time data is down. Hopefully they are still recording data on site.
I went to a bluegrass festival and the only person I ran into during the four days was my NSF program manager.
April 19, 2025 at 7:29 AM
I went to a bluegrass festival and the only person I ran into during the four days was my NSF program manager.
Reposted by Dr. Kasey Aderhold
It’s essential to revive this earlier point:
NSF is REQUIRED BY LAW to evaluate all proposals for broader impacts. DOGE will likely ask/make NSF break the law. And it’s key for members of Congress and the public to know that.
More NSF-specific legal context: www.aaup.org/sites/defaul...
NSF is REQUIRED BY LAW to evaluate all proposals for broader impacts. DOGE will likely ask/make NSF break the law. And it’s key for members of Congress and the public to know that.
More NSF-specific legal context: www.aaup.org/sites/defaul...
First off, it's critical to note:
NSF is CONGRESSIONALLY MANDATED to evaluate proposals via broader impacts, as defined by this law below.
Hence, if the admin wants NSF to deviate, that's called **breaking the law** (important to remind Congress of that)
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...
2/5
NSF is CONGRESSIONALLY MANDATED to evaluate proposals via broader impacts, as defined by this law below.
Hence, if the admin wants NSF to deviate, that's called **breaking the law** (important to remind Congress of that)
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...
2/5
April 17, 2025 at 1:11 AM
It’s essential to revive this earlier point:
NSF is REQUIRED BY LAW to evaluate all proposals for broader impacts. DOGE will likely ask/make NSF break the law. And it’s key for members of Congress and the public to know that.
More NSF-specific legal context: www.aaup.org/sites/defaul...
NSF is REQUIRED BY LAW to evaluate all proposals for broader impacts. DOGE will likely ask/make NSF break the law. And it’s key for members of Congress and the public to know that.
More NSF-specific legal context: www.aaup.org/sites/defaul...
I fully expected to be able to tag them but I forget that this community is still being built! :) I’ll text Matt.
February 6, 2025 at 11:24 PM
I fully expected to be able to tag them but I forget that this community is still being built! :) I’ll text Matt.
I’ve snapped quite a few views of it but this was one of the better ones. Was straining to see any of the monitoring equipment! The pilots often give a heads up which helps.
February 6, 2025 at 11:09 PM
I’ve snapped quite a few views of it but this was one of the better ones. Was straining to see any of the monitoring equipment! The pilots often give a heads up which helps.
You will not be erased. I see you.
a woman wearing glasses and a t-shirt that says king for a dirty woman
ALT: a woman wearing glasses and a t-shirt that says king for a dirty woman
media.tenor.com
February 5, 2025 at 2:09 PM
You will not be erased. I see you.