We have an analogous problem in bibliometrics when constructing citation networks - approving or supporting citations are treated the same way as references to work being criticised, all flattened into a "flow of influence"-like graph.

Kan han bli det første mennesket som tweeter tjuefem timer i døgnet?

They're very common? Here's a chart all sports fans can understand

I guess "lax reviewing standards" only applies to Scientific Reports. Nature the journal and the other spin-offs aren't bad, they just suffer from over-generality in their disciplinary orientation - good for summative work, but not where anyone goes to get the bleeding edge work from a given field.

Well, lax reviewing standards are only a problem when they fail to address seriously flawed papers. When the submitted paper is near perfect as is, like I'm sure your commentary was, it doesn't really factor in.

Er vel det som ligger bak rebrandingen til Fjotolf

For example, the authors fail to correct for the fact that the length of reference lists in papers is steadily increasing, so citation signals will become watered down over time unless you account for this. These things would be caught by reviewers in a disciplinary journal, but not in Nature!

...and if I feel that way regarding my own field, my suspicion is the same goes for other fields as well. An example, the much-discussed paper about how science is becoming less innovative and disruptive over time. An interesting analysis, but the methodology raises questions.

I could probably find out for you, I'm a bibliometrician. I'm not sure what you mean by a bifurcation in the citation patterns, though.

This looks really interesting! But is the website down? Can't open the link in any browser.

In time, they too will be on the list of entartete subjects...

Det krever at programmet man bruker allerede har kontrollteksten i sin base, og det er ikke alltid tilfelle. Borchs oppgave ble faktisk sjekket, men der hadde de ikke lagt inn nyere års oppgaver ennå. Regner med de nå mater inn masse oppgaver og rapporter manuelt og kjører ny sjekk hver gang.