Reposted by kai
Yeah this is a classic insight from research into AI and automation in like the 70s that everyone working on LLMs just sort of shrugged about.
When the AI's parameters are exceeded and it fails, the untrained human is LEAST qualified to take over.
When the AI's parameters are exceeded and it fails, the untrained human is LEAST qualified to take over.
January 30, 2026 at 10:53 PM
Yeah this is a classic insight from research into AI and automation in like the 70s that everyone working on LLMs just sort of shrugged about.
When the AI's parameters are exceeded and it fails, the untrained human is LEAST qualified to take over.
When the AI's parameters are exceeded and it fails, the untrained human is LEAST qualified to take over.
Reposted by kai
I feel like AI coding assistants have the same risks of level 3 or lower vehicle automation, in that they automate the easy and routine stuff which lulls the human into a false sense of security such that the human is not ready to take over when the system encounters something it can't handle.
January 30, 2026 at 10:44 PM
I feel like AI coding assistants have the same risks of level 3 or lower vehicle automation, in that they automate the easy and routine stuff which lulls the human into a false sense of security such that the human is not ready to take over when the system encounters something it can't handle.
a better metaphor might be being on a sports team?
November 20, 2025 at 9:50 PM
a better metaphor might be being on a sports team?
people are just not gonna all love or be good to each other! or even tolerate each other!
how can we build a society despite that?
how can we build a society despite that?
November 6, 2025 at 8:36 AM
people are just not gonna all love or be good to each other! or even tolerate each other!
how can we build a society despite that?
how can we build a society despite that?
I find literary fiction to be a good antidote!
November 6, 2025 at 8:32 AM
I find literary fiction to be a good antidote!