Gregory Taylor
@k6gst.bsky.social
Obscure provincial lawyer, erstwhile minor government functionary. Gentleman Photographer (Verified).
It's a crime to pay it, and a crime to receive it. Punishable by five years in prison, if done willfully.
October 24, 2025 at 10:23 PM
It's a crime to pay it, and a crime to receive it. Punishable by five years in prison, if done willfully.
I'm going to withhold judgment until I get the real story from the remaining crack corps of Pentagon-credentialed press outlets, including, for example, the Turkish state-run press agency.
October 17, 2025 at 4:50 PM
I'm going to withhold judgment until I get the real story from the remaining crack corps of Pentagon-credentialed press outlets, including, for example, the Turkish state-run press agency.
Ah yes, those foundational American principles of "support for law enforcement and border control."
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to Back the Blue and Build the Wall...
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to Back the Blue and Build the Wall...
September 26, 2025 at 5:39 PM
Ah yes, those foundational American principles of "support for law enforcement and border control."
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to Back the Blue and Build the Wall...
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to Back the Blue and Build the Wall...
I'm not a criminal defense lawyer or anything, but I think I could probably come up with some evidence to support a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(3)(iv).
September 26, 2025 at 12:47 AM
I'm not a criminal defense lawyer or anything, but I think I could probably come up with some evidence to support a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(b)(3)(iv).
They take a littoral approach to the Bible.
September 23, 2025 at 4:09 PM
They take a littoral approach to the Bible.
I understand that legislators legislate, but there already is a provision in the foundational law of our nation that protects speech, and that the president has already sworn his worthless oath to uphold it. So what else are you going to do?
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/18/u...
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/18/u...
September 18, 2025 at 7:45 PM
I understand that legislators legislate, but there already is a provision in the foundational law of our nation that protects speech, and that the president has already sworn his worthless oath to uphold it. So what else are you going to do?
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/18/u...
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/18/u...
"88" is just a coincidence, right? RIGHT?
July 25, 2025 at 7:00 PM
"88" is just a coincidence, right? RIGHT?
American cops used to look like this. Bring it back pls.
June 6, 2025 at 1:02 AM
American cops used to look like this. Bring it back pls.
I just saw this on display right now in the David Uhl gallery in the Ahern Hotel and Convention Center in Las Vegas. Posing in the moment before he bit the bird’s head off.
May 30, 2025 at 4:03 PM
I just saw this on display right now in the David Uhl gallery in the Ahern Hotel and Convention Center in Las Vegas. Posing in the moment before he bit the bird’s head off.
"We're not monsters--monsters answer to no one. We are goons. Big difference."
April 14, 2025 at 6:02 PM
"We're not monsters--monsters answer to no one. We are goons. Big difference."
If your government job puts you in a situation where you feel compelled to say this, you are morally fucked if you don't quit.
April 14, 2025 at 5:52 PM
If your government job puts you in a situation where you feel compelled to say this, you are morally fucked if you don't quit.
Literal secret police stuff. How literal? This literal:
March 27, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Literal secret police stuff. How literal? This literal:
Hey guys, any other news?
March 25, 2025 at 11:39 PM
Hey guys, any other news?
@jeffreygoldberg.bsky.social, are you also on this Signal chat?
March 25, 2025 at 11:00 PM
@jeffreygoldberg.bsky.social, are you also on this Signal chat?
NYT: Oh no, what if they fail the test??
As @jvl.bsky.social and @billkristolbulwark.bsky.social noted today, "no one is even pretending that the Department of Justice will conduct a good-faith investigation and, if warranted, prosecute this apparent law breaking."
As @jvl.bsky.social and @billkristolbulwark.bsky.social noted today, "no one is even pretending that the Department of Justice will conduct a good-faith investigation and, if warranted, prosecute this apparent law breaking."
March 25, 2025 at 10:51 PM
NYT: Oh no, what if they fail the test??
As @jvl.bsky.social and @billkristolbulwark.bsky.social noted today, "no one is even pretending that the Department of Justice will conduct a good-faith investigation and, if warranted, prosecute this apparent law breaking."
As @jvl.bsky.social and @billkristolbulwark.bsky.social noted today, "no one is even pretending that the Department of Justice will conduct a good-faith investigation and, if warranted, prosecute this apparent law breaking."
I didn't watch this with the sound on but I assume it's him explaining how he and Ballard deploy the couples ruse.
March 13, 2025 at 12:41 AM
I didn't watch this with the sound on but I assume it's him explaining how he and Ballard deploy the couples ruse.