It's a thousand times better than the NFL rules and I'm pretty confident that view would poll over 90%. In a sport in which a drive can easily take 10+ minutes, the only remotely fair alternative is to play another full quarter. This way is fair and gets to a resolution relatively quickly.

Lol, what? I've never met someone who isn't? What's not to love about thus?

Looks like you have it all figured out. Fortunately everyone agrees on who sucks a person. Nice, easy, objective standard. Glad we got that worked out.

Who makes that decision and how? You're advocating for a platform to make it a practice of arbitrarily banning users that they personally don't agree with. Aside from the obvious risk of that going totally sideways, I don't see how they practically and consistently make those determinations.

Of course they have the right. One could argue they have the moral imperative even. My point is that it is a very difficult policy to enforce, both practically and from a fairness standpoint.

Your thoughtful input on this topic is noted.

Isn't it? How do you fairly apply a policy of pre-emptively banning anyone who hasn't violated your TOS but is unpleasant or harmful elsewhere on the internet? It seems to me to be much more fair and straightforward to simply enforce your TOS and determine bans accordingly.

It's been a loooong December and it's an absolute certainty next year is going to be worse than the last.

As an Actuary, I can relate...

That's right. It's good right now. Followed very quickly by scary and bad.

Am I misunderstanding something? Sounds like they're changing plans from fossil fuels to a clean, renewable energy source?

Beautiful city.

🙏 First stadium built specifically for any professional women's sports team of any kind.

Yep. Such unique songwriting.

They're excellent.