Juliana Taube
banner
julianataube.bsky.social
Juliana Taube
@julianataube.bsky.social
phd student @ georgetown • aspiring infectious disease modeler • she/her
jtaube.github.io
Reposted by Juliana Taube
We are currently accepting submissions for lightning talks to showcase the wide variety of tools and visualizations people have created. All formats are welcome (dashboards, animations, graphics, story-driven websites, etc.). See the website for more info!
October 10, 2025 at 2:26 PM
What is the purpose of inoculating the pigs in both isolators 1 and 2? Seems like the isolator 3 pigs could have been infected by either set of inoculated pigs, & this was a missed opportunity to test aerosol transmission distance limits/sensitivity.
September 29, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Thanks to the Delphi Group at Carnegie Mellon for sharing their survey data!

And thanks to you, dear reader, for making it this far! 😅

13/13
September 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM
We still need additional contact surveys in the US, esp. focused on
🚸 children
👭 assortative mixing patterns (when people interact w/ others w/ similar characteristics)
📅 individual behavior change over time

Our pandemic & baseline contact estimates are available at github.com/bansallab/re...

/12
GitHub - bansallab/resp_contact
Contribute to bansallab/resp_contact development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
September 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM
3️⃣ During the pandemic & at baseline, younger adults, men, & Hispanic & Black individuals have more contacts & are at greater disease risk

These geographic & social differences in risk can help target public health resources & surveillance 📢

/11
September 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM
2️⃣ Contact patterns vary across US counties regardless of disease 🌎

Based on population density, we expected urban counties 🏙️ to have higher contact rates than rural ones 🚜

This is true at baseline, but not during the pandemic, when urban areas were more responsive to gathering restrictions

/10
September 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM
If contact rates aren’t changing much over time, then increased winter respiratory infections may be driven more by where contact is happening (indoors 🏢 vs outdoors ⛰️ ) rather than by an increase in overall contacts

See @zsusswein.bsky.social's paper for more on this: doi.org/10.7554/eLif...

/9
Disentangling the rhythms of human activity in the built environment for airborne transmission risk: An analysis of large-scale mobility data
Fine-grain mobility data empirically quantify the propensity for human mixing to be indoors across the US and improve understanding of the relationship between the physical environment and infection r...
doi.org
September 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM
1️⃣ Early in the pandemic, contact varied over time 📆

However, contact and COVID-19 incidence were anti-correlated during this period (when disease went ⬆️, contacts went ⬇️)

Thus, after controlling for disease, there was no longer any systematic variation in contact over time

/8
September 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM
I know what you're thinking

"These survey data are from early in the pandemic, and it's 2025... 🙄 Is this even relevant?"

We got you! 🫡

By controlling for the effect of cases, vaccines & pandemic policies on contact, we inferred baseline contact patterns in the US 🎉

So what did we find?

/7
September 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM
Here, we tackle these questions using a large survey in the US from June 2020 to April 2021 📝

Contacts are defined as either:
🗣️ conversations >5 mins long w/ someone <6 ft away
or
🫂 physical contact

We analyze the average # of contacts in each county for each week in the study period

/6
September 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM
Hopefully, you're convinced that contact patterns are important by this point.

Yet we know relatively little about them in the US! 😧

🗺️ Do contact rates differ across counties?
☃️ Are contact rates ⬆️ in winter, driving resp. infections, like flu?
👵 How do contacts vary with age, gender, & race?

/5
September 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM
For this reason, we model disease spread on networks, where some people have more connections than others.

And theory suggests that the people with more contacts are more likely to get infected 🤒

Thus, understanding contact patterns can help us better estimate individual & population risk!

/4
September 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM
Initially, disease models relied on the homogeneous mixing assumption, where each person has the same number of contacts 👯‍♀️ #twins

But from past surveys (eg POLYMOD) we know that there's actually lots of variation in # of contacts across individuals & this heterogeneity affects disease spread! 🤓

/3
September 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM
Interactions between individuals (contacts) provide opportunities for respiratory infectious disease transmission 🦠

By studying these interactions and incorporating them into mathematical models, we can better predict how far and fast diseases can spread 📈

/2
September 12, 2025 at 4:36 PM