Really liking Cursor so far. My job purchased for me and honestly it’s been really convenient having the tab follow-up, composer and the local file context that is shared in the git repo.

Pretty neat. Wouldn’t pay it myself for personal stuff though.

Cursor really tempts me away from PyCharm, which has always been my regular. Being able to see the AI-produced code as a diff and accept/reject parts of it feels so much better than a 'wholesale insert' or 'copy, paste, delete' flow. Model/context also seems good

Cursor.

The Cursor Tab feature is pretty killer. Takes AI autocomplete to the next level.

It usually works really well when I’m making a small change. It predicts what I’m doing and makes sure I don’t miss any spots.

VSCode + Sourcegraph Cody.

You can choose the model you want to sue, host your own, and has strong guarantees about prompt retention from outside providers.

Also GraphRAG on each project for better retrieval is noticeably higher quality than competitors.

Cursor. The UX is amazing. It's on top of VS code, so it doesn't feel like a new IDE.
Model switching helps me try different models. The different interfaces - chat, Cmd + k, and autocomplete each serve very distinct use case and they feel natural.

Their diff is the standout feature for me

m using Cursor mostly because it feels well integrated with my regular coding workflow.

In-line edits can be done easily without using mouse, for larger chunks you have friendly multi-file edits.

Also their recent acquisition gives me high hopes for even better quality of the AI output.

Yeah that too for 10$. Compared to 20 on cursor