honestly think Jay Jones is militant, nor does anyone else. His opponent, by contrast, actually supports the MAGA political violence of January 6, ICE raids, etc. Jones's private texts aren't in the same ballpark as this and we shouldn't pretend otherwise to virtue signal.
November 6, 2025 at 5:19 PM
honestly think Jay Jones is militant, nor does anyone else. His opponent, by contrast, actually supports the MAGA political violence of January 6, ICE raids, etc. Jones's private texts aren't in the same ballpark as this and we shouldn't pretend otherwise to virtue signal.
Nobody actually thinks Jay Jones will commit or support real political violence, including them. Meanwhile the NoVa right wingers support this actual violence against their neighbors:
November 6, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Nobody actually thinks Jay Jones will commit or support real political violence, including them. Meanwhile the NoVa right wingers support this actual violence against their neighbors:
And it's hard to find the right language, bc there were many sincere believers in conservatism in the 80s-90s. But the economic principles behind it have by now been totally debunked, and the whole thing was designed to launder racism using dog whistles that Trump simply found he could say openly:
October 31, 2025 at 5:31 PM
And it's hard to find the right language, bc there were many sincere believers in conservatism in the 80s-90s. But the economic principles behind it have by now been totally debunked, and the whole thing was designed to launder racism using dog whistles that Trump simply found he could say openly:
If you're talking about these passages, it's the opposite of my point. The issue, imo, isn't Dems crafting the perfect message to break through the current media landscape, but addressing the media landscape itself. Where is the Dem answer to FoxNews & the rest of it? I'm a New Republic subscriber
October 30, 2025 at 4:56 PM
If you're talking about these passages, it's the opposite of my point. The issue, imo, isn't Dems crafting the perfect message to break through the current media landscape, but addressing the media landscape itself. Where is the Dem answer to FoxNews & the rest of it? I'm a New Republic subscriber
Are they? Trump's approval floor is pretty stable at around 37%. There's been no sign of that floor cracking at all. It's a fool's errand and a waste of time. Even in the Great Depression, Hoover got 40% against FDR!
October 26, 2025 at 7:56 PM
Are they? Trump's approval floor is pretty stable at around 37%. There's been no sign of that floor cracking at all. It's a fool's errand and a waste of time. Even in the Great Depression, Hoover got 40% against FDR!
garnish your wages. At that point, you can probably sue the IRS saying, hey I paid, it's the state that is holding the money, but that could take a long time, you might not even win, and my guess is that you'd need a court order to halt the IRS garnishment process in the meantime.
October 20, 2025 at 3:04 PM
garnish your wages. At that point, you can probably sue the IRS saying, hey I paid, it's the state that is holding the money, but that could take a long time, you might not even win, and my guess is that you'd need a court order to halt the IRS garnishment process in the meantime.
No, states holding the $ is just his leverage point to keep it from the feds. As he admits in this part, the Trump IRS is almost certain to deem our taxes unpaid and go after us individually. He doesn't address this other than to say we'll fight in court. It's not that easy & he's not a lawyer!
October 20, 2025 at 2:58 PM
No, states holding the $ is just his leverage point to keep it from the feds. As he admits in this part, the Trump IRS is almost certain to deem our taxes unpaid and go after us individually. He doesn't address this other than to say we'll fight in court. It's not that easy & he's not a lawyer!
The author doesn't seem to be an attorney & I don't follow how he so easily dismisses the threat of tax penalties on citizens. He seems to think the legal challenges that will ensue will be only state vs fed. Instead it will be the IRS seizing individual's property to pay tax penalties. That's bad!
October 20, 2025 at 12:25 PM
The author doesn't seem to be an attorney & I don't follow how he so easily dismisses the threat of tax penalties on citizens. He seems to think the legal challenges that will ensue will be only state vs fed. Instead it will be the IRS seizing individual's property to pay tax penalties. That's bad!