Great to see the crowds, but I would like to see speakers more on message though, with so many things to talk about re Trump et al that the whole crowd is presumably united against. Felt this way at the last Prov No Kings rally too. Might check out one of the many smaller ones around next time!

I also find it concerning that it seems like there’s an assumption that there’s something sketchy going on if you are unwilling or unable to publicly share data, despite there being many reasons why that may not be a reasonable idea for a given dataset.

Yeah I agree, and I think the tone probably genuinely alienates a lot of people.

It also feels very all or nothing sometimes when I think the reality is that it doesn’t have to be all the things to moving toward improved rigor.

@abctnow.bsky.social

Depends partly on whether it’s prone to baseline or intercept effects on change. Like if someone is coming in particularly high on whatever, does that create a ceiling effect for upward change? Or create greater potential for downward change? Then there’s a lot of potential for stable confounds.

Ha, that example is also relevant to many other groups too (and maybe just people broadly).

And also this one, bc it turns out anger rumination (at least in a college sample measured with the ARS), also ends up zero-inflated and looking like a count variable. This was all part of the nerdiest, long-distance crafts night possible with @clearlab.bsky.social 😆 #stats #PsychSciSky

Thank you for your work on this important issue!