(There is in actual-facts no way they can control the story now, or tease out details about individual Democrats—leaders, influentials, or voters—without also widening the aperture trained on THE MAN CURRENTLY IN THE WHITE HOUSE, & if some Democratic sexual predators go down in the process? 🥳)

This is a 19-paragraph article to which 7 journalists contributed; it contains not a single hint that there is any impropriety in the President of the United States directing the Justice Department to investigate his political adversaries.

anybody who is guilty should be held accountable for their actions but if you interpret this move as a sincere effort to find guilty parties instead of a transparently desperate effort to *evade* accountability I recommend frequently checking your wallet. You are what's commonly known as a "mark."

From the UVA faculty senate

bsky.app/profile/aris...

it’s about the categories that older men place young girls into where some get to be protected and some get sexualized and like who is worthy of being treated like a person

Almost as if the role of a public servant should be to serve the public

Your job is to get elected, fix things, and win because the public notices things have got better. It's not to spend your entire term, years out from an election, playing a game of mirrors trying to change your appearance

"may" is too much allowance here, I think

This is the main problem with vulgar Marxist materialism tbh. You get too caught up in looking behind the curtain for the man in the top hat when it comes to like racism or nationalism. Sometimes things just are what they are.

No effort by DOJ to legally justify the strikes on the merits, eg how is this an armed conflict, how are the targets lawful military objectives.

I appreciate that the world in 2025 is vastly different and more complicated than it was in the 70s, but “we ran out of furniture to burn and then the crisis was back” just feels right, to me.