Jonny
@jonnysilence.bsky.social
German guy with no credentials. Love magic cards and social politics. Like history but no history buffs.
The most popular American Chinese dishes do also not exist in China. It's just a "foreign food" thing.
December 19, 2025 at 9:39 AM
The most popular American Chinese dishes do also not exist in China. It's just a "foreign food" thing.
Bulk? Enormous Baloth!
There are things you cannot eat. For everything else, there's Enormous Baloth!
Pros:
- is Enormous
- is Baloth
Cons:
-
There are things you cannot eat. For everything else, there's Enormous Baloth!
Pros:
- is Enormous
- is Baloth
Cons:
-
December 18, 2025 at 2:10 PM
Bulk? Enormous Baloth!
There are things you cannot eat. For everything else, there's Enormous Baloth!
Pros:
- is Enormous
- is Baloth
Cons:
-
There are things you cannot eat. For everything else, there's Enormous Baloth!
Pros:
- is Enormous
- is Baloth
Cons:
-
It's stronger in fairer decks, but imo even more annoying to resolve.
December 18, 2025 at 2:08 PM
It's stronger in fairer decks, but imo even more annoying to resolve.
They didn't HAVE to change the wording. They willingly decided to. Sadly.
December 18, 2025 at 9:51 AM
They didn't HAVE to change the wording. They willingly decided to. Sadly.
Such a neat old set. I keep forgetting Amon Amarth can be fun.
Definitely would have profited heavily from being a full block.
On the issue of pulling MDFCs especially the pathways, out of sleeves - I just can't. I'm very glad we have the technology of placeholder cards and extra Deckbox space.
Definitely would have profited heavily from being a full block.
On the issue of pulling MDFCs especially the pathways, out of sleeves - I just can't. I'm very glad we have the technology of placeholder cards and extra Deckbox space.
December 16, 2025 at 9:39 AM
Such a neat old set. I keep forgetting Amon Amarth can be fun.
Definitely would have profited heavily from being a full block.
On the issue of pulling MDFCs especially the pathways, out of sleeves - I just can't. I'm very glad we have the technology of placeholder cards and extra Deckbox space.
Definitely would have profited heavily from being a full block.
On the issue of pulling MDFCs especially the pathways, out of sleeves - I just can't. I'm very glad we have the technology of placeholder cards and extra Deckbox space.
Not W has... Original 4c commander precon, aka Yidris and Partners...? Nothing else since? Wow. Have all the others gotten more? Not B has had multiples, at least. Not R has Atraxa. Does Not G have more after Breya? Does Not U even still have Saskia? I never see those.
December 14, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Not W has... Original 4c commander precon, aka Yidris and Partners...? Nothing else since? Wow. Have all the others gotten more? Not B has had multiples, at least. Not R has Atraxa. Does Not G have more after Breya? Does Not U even still have Saskia? I never see those.
... that's why the original comment said "in the 17th century"?
December 14, 2025 at 7:55 AM
... that's why the original comment said "in the 17th century"?
I don't actively dislike her. I'm fine if she's on store radio or whatever, but wouldn't dream of putting her on, myself. Very inoffensive, bit catchy, but overall forgettable. I just don't get why people hype her as the best thing ever. It's like being a boiled potatoes superfan.
December 13, 2025 at 10:52 AM
I don't actively dislike her. I'm fine if she's on store radio or whatever, but wouldn't dream of putting her on, myself. Very inoffensive, bit catchy, but overall forgettable. I just don't get why people hype her as the best thing ever. It's like being a boiled potatoes superfan.
That's probably still nda
December 12, 2025 at 7:00 PM
That's probably still nda
Aye, that's what I meant by "just for checking". There are Enchantment types (saga, aura) that have actual mechanical implications, while others (shrine) work more like creature types, in that they don't actually do anything and are just there to be checked by other cards. I wonder which one this is
December 11, 2025 at 8:54 AM
Aye, that's what I meant by "just for checking". There are Enchantment types (saga, aura) that have actual mechanical implications, while others (shrine) work more like creature types, in that they don't actually do anything and are just there to be checked by other cards. I wonder which one this is
Okay, but what does the type actually do? It's just for checking, right?
December 11, 2025 at 8:02 AM
Okay, but what does the type actually do? It's just for checking, right?
It has negligible resale value, but it tends to not get deleted, it can be lent out, it's always right there... And it's often not much more expensive than "buying" on platforms like prime or YouTube, or than subscribing to a new platform for a month.
December 9, 2025 at 10:21 AM
It has negligible resale value, but it tends to not get deleted, it can be lent out, it's always right there... And it's often not much more expensive than "buying" on platforms like prime or YouTube, or than subscribing to a new platform for a month.
Sometimes I forget what a luxury having my own washing machine is.
December 9, 2025 at 10:19 AM
Sometimes I forget what a luxury having my own washing machine is.
There should be a way to put negative donations into those funding campaigns. Would be hilarious.
December 9, 2025 at 10:15 AM
There should be a way to put negative donations into those funding campaigns. Would be hilarious.
Basilisk Collar and Thornbite staff.
December 7, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Basilisk Collar and Thornbite staff.
OG bill is pretty good. Supporter Bill isn't worth the supporter slot.
December 6, 2025 at 9:15 PM
OG bill is pretty good. Supporter Bill isn't worth the supporter slot.
Gruul with interaction, even!
December 6, 2025 at 11:26 AM
Gruul with interaction, even!
It's angry simic, what's not to like?
December 6, 2025 at 11:24 AM
It's angry simic, what's not to like?
At that point, why not get Jake back, too? And also just call Seth Saffron in the description.
December 4, 2025 at 11:54 AM
At that point, why not get Jake back, too? And also just call Seth Saffron in the description.