Source?

Would that post have one?

Not having an iPad app was a huge issue for me and Bluesky just because of the way I do things. I like having a phone, a tablet that is a bridge device (I can use either fingers or keyboard), and my Real Computer. So I am just reveling now.

I like it, but yeah. I’m doing Bluesky in it now, and thank god I have a viable option. At the same time, the back button in the app is mostly obscured by the traffic lights upper left.

Whatever, man, whatever. E release.

Soon. The pink wig opens the door to meta costumes.

If I wash up a pretty rock and say, “look at this pretty rock,” it isn’t (yet) art. If I put it in jewelry, it is. The photographer has to do something. It is a big smeary line, and lots of meta things can be art. There has to be artifice. And how much artifice is a debate.

No, for the reasons Amy says and more. I will steal the mcd’s quip. I’m pretty radical on acceptance of art, but art implies intention. Art comes from artifice. One can take found things and make art, including pretty stones on the ground or accidental selfies. They themselves are not art (yet) art.

I just get mine from a mix.

Sorry. I bought up as much of Randall Grahm’s “I am not drinking any &£$@ing merlot” (which was a merlot) as I could.

Congratulations! So well deserved!

The term of art is "mattress run," a back-formation from the slang term "milage run," an airline trip to hit a milage goal. I once did a mattress run for the same reason. Found a cheap out of the way place, and just went there every day, moved the bedding around, ate the fruit plate and left.

Thank you. My Twitter experience is cleaner than my experience here because I block early, often, and so much, that it isn't awful, especially considering the source. Here, though, it's all outrage about what goes on there. When some fashie posts their latest bile, I find it here, not there.

Doubly ouch.

Woot! Looking forward to getting it!

So why don’t y’all just use it? Come on. You know how!