I like likelihoods.

It is a model all the way down.

I taught this for the first time in my course this year. We ended up doing a couple of weeks. It isn't much, but at least they got a taste of it.

What an interesting sounding course!

As my mum would say: :Butter wouldn't melt in its mouth".

I make the sun rise by waking up.

TSGTA =Three statisticians gave ten answers.

Oorah. The other day I felt real feelings.

Owf. Damage done.

I miss random too, but am all for an adopted kitten, yay.

The new normal.

So senseless. What a waste of life.

God loved everyone whoever they are, man, woman or any other child of god.

And what is your evidence against it?

To double down as a statistician, what is your null hypothesis?

Not all fields are at the same levels of maturity. Physics is at a different level of maturity as the social sciences, for example. Do you have an expectant difference in replicability for *any* field for the replicability given that all fields are exploring the forefront of their research areas?

As the prior probability of any arbitrary molecule curing a cancer is extremely low than by Bayes rule alone even an extremely efficient science would produce many false positives.

Frequentist super-raft vs Bayesian superyachts, I know what I am choosing.

Then why use the word crisis? If science isn't stagnating, is there really a crisis?