Assuming that the recent acceleration in warming is NOT due to reductions in aerosol emissions, we get can apply a slightly sloping curve. That would land us at about ~2.1°C.
Assuming that the recent acceleration in warming is NOT due to reductions in aerosol emissions, we get can apply a slightly sloping curve. That would land us at about ~2.1°C.
Assuming a close to linear temperature trend lands us pretty much at 2°C.
Assuming a close to linear temperature trend lands us pretty much at 2°C.
We'll then assume that SO2 emissions were insignificant, meaning that warming could progress unabated. No changes to our CO2 emissions assumptions, so we can simply shift the curve left to close the gap:
We'll then assume that SO2 emissions were insignificant, meaning that warming could progress unabated. No changes to our CO2 emissions assumptions, so we can simply shift the curve left to close the gap:
For this, we'll use the most up to date ensemble chart for global average temperatures. Luckily, a good soul has provided a cutting edge graph for Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempera...
First step: We'll remove source labels and extend the scale to 2,5°C.
For this, we'll use the most up to date ensemble chart for global average temperatures. Luckily, a good soul has provided a cutting edge graph for Wikipedia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempera...
First step: We'll remove source labels and extend the scale to 2,5°C.
Circled in red: downstream pathologies of excess omega 6 linoleic acid consumption.
#GLP-1 agonists are very efficient at addressing those, apparently.
Or people could just stop eating soybean and sunflower oil.
Circled in red: downstream pathologies of excess omega 6 linoleic acid consumption.
#GLP-1 agonists are very efficient at addressing those, apparently.
Or people could just stop eating soybean and sunflower oil.