@joemontana1.bsky.social
Reposted
The “Bela” mystery is solved, Musk and Murdoch are teaming up to influence and rig the upcoming US elections.
Musk was passing through Bella to a property owned by James Murdoch, the son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch. He is also a board member of Tesla.
Musk was passing through Bella to a property owned by James Murdoch, the son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch. He is also a board member of Tesla.
August 20, 2025 at 1:56 AM
The “Bela” mystery is solved, Musk and Murdoch are teaming up to influence and rig the upcoming US elections.
Musk was passing through Bella to a property owned by James Murdoch, the son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch. He is also a board member of Tesla.
Musk was passing through Bella to a property owned by James Murdoch, the son of media mogul Rupert Murdoch. He is also a board member of Tesla.
Reposted
Wow so you’re telling me everyone who cheered on the Iraq war is on board with this now too? And so are the people who opposed the Iran nuclear deal and killed it?
You’re kidding.
You’re kidding.
June 22, 2025 at 11:48 PM
Wow so you’re telling me everyone who cheered on the Iraq war is on board with this now too? And so are the people who opposed the Iran nuclear deal and killed it?
You’re kidding.
You’re kidding.
Reposted
Following a rich white man to war because you didn’t like the sound of a black woman laughing will go down in American history as one of the stupidest things ever.
June 22, 2025 at 4:40 AM
Following a rich white man to war because you didn’t like the sound of a black woman laughing will go down in American history as one of the stupidest things ever.
Reposted
Justice Jackson taking on Gorsuch's "pure textualism" and arguing for a more holistic reading of Congress' handiwork—worth reading in full. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...
![The majority’s contention that I reject “ ‘pure textualism’ [a]s insufficiently pliable to secure the result [I] seek,” ante, at 10, stems from an
unfortunate misunderstanding of the judicial role. Our interpretative
task is not to seek our own desired results (whatever they may be). And,
indeed, it is precisely because of this solemn duty that, in my view, it is
imperative that we interpret statutes consistent with all relevant indicia
of what Congress wanted, as best we can ascertain its intent. A methodology that includes consideration of Congress’s aims does exactly that—
and no more. By contrast, pure textualism’s refusal to try to understand
the text of a statute in the larger context of what Congress sought to
achieve turns the interpretive task into a potent weapon for advancing
judicial policy preferences. By “finding” answers in ambiguous text, and
not bothering to consider whether those answers align with other sources
of statutory meaning, pure textualists can easily disguise their own preferences as “textual” inevitabilities. So, really, far from being “insufficiently pliable,” I think pure textualism is incessantly malleable—that’s
its primary problem—and, indeed, it is certainly somehow always flexible enough to secure the majority’s desired outcome.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:6h7b2i6ttw3l4t7pvbvxdith/bafkreih3qdtlloz3yhggypbtwiveqdgzzfgapsnetvq7qsni7wfmyuovoi@jpeg)
June 20, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Justice Jackson taking on Gorsuch's "pure textualism" and arguing for a more holistic reading of Congress' handiwork—worth reading in full. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...
Reposted
Popcorn Alert: The House Ethics Committee has voted to release the Matt Gaetz report.
December 18, 2024 at 3:05 PM
Popcorn Alert: The House Ethics Committee has voted to release the Matt Gaetz report.
That was pathetic bears. How do you leave someone that wide open.
November 17, 2024 at 8:39 PM
That was pathetic bears. How do you leave someone that wide open.
Reposted
With another million new users signing up each day, a reminder for those looking for me, I’m here!🙋🏻♂️
November 17, 2024 at 1:54 AM
With another million new users signing up each day, a reminder for those looking for me, I’m here!🙋🏻♂️
Reposted
