@joehuntercomedy.bsky.social
Comedian, Photographer, Polymath. Dickhead.
It's not nonsense. It's lies. Call it what it is.
June 22, 2025 at 8:36 PM
It's not nonsense. It's lies. Call it what it is.
I asked Burrell what RW propoganda he thinks I was reading, he wouldn't answer the question.
March 28, 2025 at 1:38 AM
I asked Burrell what RW propoganda he thinks I was reading, he wouldn't answer the question.
I spoke to Graeme Burrell on Threads. He is a complete weirdo. I stated clearly how the proposed changes will impact disabled people in real terms, and he said I was reading too much RW propaganda and angrily said that he will block me if I continue to spread falsehoods. It was bizarre
March 28, 2025 at 1:36 AM
I spoke to Graeme Burrell on Threads. He is a complete weirdo. I stated clearly how the proposed changes will impact disabled people in real terms, and he said I was reading too much RW propaganda and angrily said that he will block me if I continue to spread falsehoods. It was bizarre
And what about morally? Arbitrarily assigning another large round of cuts to disability on the fly the night before a national budget?
March 27, 2025 at 1:35 AM
And what about morally? Arbitrarily assigning another large round of cuts to disability on the fly the night before a national budget?
'Sharp knock on effects' meaning domino effect of life destroying state sanctioned barbarism
March 26, 2025 at 3:29 AM
'Sharp knock on effects' meaning domino effect of life destroying state sanctioned barbarism
Why do you think it's funny to take the piss out of disabled people? MAGA are awful but calling a paralysed wheelchair bound man 'Hot Wheels' and laughing at it makes you look like as bad as them
March 25, 2025 at 11:23 PM
Why do you think it's funny to take the piss out of disabled people? MAGA are awful but calling a paralysed wheelchair bound man 'Hot Wheels' and laughing at it makes you look like as bad as them
Yes, it's quite telling.
March 25, 2025 at 2:00 PM
Yes, it's quite telling.
'With the hope of minimal real impact'. 1.2million disabled people losing PIP, LCWRA, Carer's Allowance and Council tax reduction. The scale of this injustice if pushed through will ruin Labour for years. A Labour party that attacks disabled people is not a serious one.
March 25, 2025 at 1:50 PM
'With the hope of minimal real impact'. 1.2million disabled people losing PIP, LCWRA, Carer's Allowance and Council tax reduction. The scale of this injustice if pushed through will ruin Labour for years. A Labour party that attacks disabled people is not a serious one.
Another question: How does it make sense that a disabled person who scored 8-12+ PIP points over a broad section of criteria fail to get PIP? The've demonstrated they have multiple issues. Why are multiple issue disabled people being cast adrift like their disabilties don't matter or are not costly?
March 24, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Another question: How does it make sense that a disabled person who scored 8-12+ PIP points over a broad section of criteria fail to get PIP? The've demonstrated they have multiple issues. Why are multiple issue disabled people being cast adrift like their disabilties don't matter or are not costly?
It'll be stripped from everyone who fails to make the PIP 4pts in one descriptor requirement - Really difficult to get no matter how disabled you are - which in practical terms means potentially over a million disabled people suddenly having no no PIP, no LCWRA, no Carer's Allowance.
March 24, 2025 at 1:28 PM
It'll be stripped from everyone who fails to make the PIP 4pts in one descriptor requirement - Really difficult to get no matter how disabled you are - which in practical terms means potentially over a million disabled people suddenly having no no PIP, no LCWRA, no Carer's Allowance.
How does cutting PIP completely from disabed people 'provide for the genuine'?
March 23, 2025 at 9:11 PM
How does cutting PIP completely from disabed people 'provide for the genuine'?
He's not an honourable man. He's proposing to cut 1.2million disabled people off PIP and further support to pay for what? Appeasing Trump and paying off bankrupt water companies? It's digusting, those are not the actions of an honourable man
March 23, 2025 at 8:16 PM
He's not an honourable man. He's proposing to cut 1.2million disabled people off PIP and further support to pay for what? Appeasing Trump and paying off bankrupt water companies? It's digusting, those are not the actions of an honourable man
It's plausible deniability. The less they officially know, the more they can lie
February 12, 2025 at 5:17 PM
It's plausible deniability. The less they officially know, the more they can lie
I think he's stupid and has no real interest in helping the economy, just himself
January 26, 2025 at 2:55 PM
I think he's stupid and has no real interest in helping the economy, just himself
I smell 'Trump TVs' incoming..
January 26, 2025 at 2:54 PM
I smell 'Trump TVs' incoming..
Yes. Win win for Trump's US manufacturing donors because when the competition who pay tariffs have to raise their prices then they can undercut and/or raise their own prices thus increasing their profit margins. In that scenario everyone loses except his donors. And himself.
January 26, 2025 at 2:53 PM
Yes. Win win for Trump's US manufacturing donors because when the competition who pay tariffs have to raise their prices then they can undercut and/or raise their own prices thus increasing their profit margins. In that scenario everyone loses except his donors. And himself.
Does this explain why Trump really wants tariffs? To scare off his donor's competition and thus win them the larger market share in the US?
January 26, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Does this explain why Trump really wants tariffs? To scare off his donor's competition and thus win them the larger market share in the US?
We don't do revolutions. When the French Govt increased their retirement age they had riots. When the Tories did it - Our older people voted for them.
January 26, 2025 at 2:20 PM
We don't do revolutions. When the French Govt increased their retirement age they had riots. When the Tories did it - Our older people voted for them.
The alienation should come when his agenda has and continues to have no positive material impact on the prosperity of his base. We saw this with the Tories. It's no guarantee though, as I've never seen this level of cultish lunacy in my lifetime. Cultists tend not to care about material reality.
January 21, 2025 at 11:45 PM
The alienation should come when his agenda has and continues to have no positive material impact on the prosperity of his base. We saw this with the Tories. It's no guarantee though, as I've never seen this level of cultish lunacy in my lifetime. Cultists tend not to care about material reality.
We should claim to know it was one, on account of the fact the entire gesture was recorded on video. The first one, and the second one. That's pretty conclusive. Really weird take, telling people they shouldn't claim to know things they just saw with their own eyes.
January 21, 2025 at 11:40 PM
We should claim to know it was one, on account of the fact the entire gesture was recorded on video. The first one, and the second one. That's pretty conclusive. Really weird take, telling people they shouldn't claim to know things they just saw with their own eyes.