So as I read Jackson set it up so if appeals court upholds the order requiring payments by Monday at latest then SCOTUS would have to review and issue final ruling within the week if appealed. Had she not it could have sat for months without resolution regardless of the appeal court outcome.

Congratulations, looking forward to having you help us keep track of all the crazy movement each year.

Per T-mobile's privacy policy it says it is taking only a "silhouette" to determine if a human is sitting in the seat. Assuming that is true, the more disturbing fact is it is also collecting location data of the "driver" and can derive the origin/dest of every ride without the rider's consent.

If R8 does work this way, what if ART is tuned on apps with both obfuscation and optimization enabled. Maybe that is why ART does the alphabetical sort which wasn't explained. My point is naming becomes even harder, if you are trying to optimize performance by tweaking a name in an obfuscated app.

I wouldn't rely on this behavior without confirmation. However, looking at various app's mapping files, R8 seems to obfuscate a class starting with the letter "a" and moves through the alphabet. No exact guarantee "start" will be "a" but if R8 has this logic, "end" will be assigned a greater letter.

In this case wouldn't the obfuscated code run 40% faster when using start/end because R8 renamed them to a/b? I'm sure you could derive a case where the opposite is true as well.

What about obfuscation? Doesn't R8 rename things and is that why it tends to rename in a specific pattern? Looking at samples from my mapping.txt the first member tends to get renamed "a" and second member "b" for objects.

Texas (3) have the 6th seed and feed into the boise st portion of the bracket. However, if you feel Ohio St is too strong, then the rankings are probably wrong. Personally, I'd have ND(3), Tex (4), Ohio St (5), Penn St (6). Using the above seeding logic, I think it would be more balanced.

I disagree that any of the solutions @nauerbach.com proposes here are good. Instead you seed the 4 conference champions 1-4. Then you place teams in the bracket per the rankings. Ie I'd have Penn St (4) the 5th seed (still playing SMU) to feed into the Arizona State side of the bracket as expected.

Nicole, I see college overtime as a result ties were terrible before BCS, but is a regular season tie terrible in this system? For format change Id eliminate calling TO during shootout as that was silly in Georgia game. I'd also start with no FG and must go for two after any TD from the start.

Is it me or has A&M not looked the same since Le'Veon Moss went out. It feels like they keep trying power runs but Daniels isn't that kind of back.