joanne m. chung
banner
joannemchung.bsky.social
joanne m. chung
@joannemchung.bsky.social
korean american personality psychologist @ university of toronto mississauga. studies culture, the self, & emotion using longitudinal, behavioral, qualitative, and community-engaged approaches. makes art & loves the absurd. cats & riot grrrl 4eva. she/her.
You play the drums? 🤩
November 27, 2024 at 5:04 PM
And these are some open-ended questions that we've asked as well:
1) If the time in which you participated in the study was not typical for you, what happened during this time that made it unusual?
2) What are the most notable events, both good and bad, that happened in your life during this time?
November 22, 2024 at 2:03 AM
We've asked close-ended questions with response categories: (1) Strongly agree to (5) Strongly disagree

1) In general, my participation in the study…
a) interfered with my daily life
b) made me more aware of my feelings

2) The time in which I participated in the study was typical for me.
November 22, 2024 at 2:03 AM
Ooh, thanks for sharing!
November 22, 2024 at 1:48 AM
🥳✨🙌
November 22, 2024 at 1:21 AM
Haha totally. These projects can take so long! Here’s one more that is a nice reminder that talking w/ ppl is good when trying to create a scale: psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/...
Measure Twice, Cut down Error: A Process for Enhancing the Validity of Survey Scales - Hunter Gehlbach, Maureen E. Brinkworth, 2011
For years psychologists across many subfields have undertaken the formidable challenge of designing survey scales to assess attitudes, opinions, and behaviors. ...
psycnet.apa.org
November 22, 2024 at 1:13 AM
Yup! I’ve done a lot of scale construction stuff and if I can offer a recommendation— I wish I had done cognitive interviewing to better understand how people were generating their responses. I think it’s underused but so important and helpful!
November 22, 2024 at 1:06 AM
One on general scale construction stuff that I recommend a lot. I especially love the discussion on generating items that are at the edges of what you think the construct is about as it helps ensure that you’re working with a lot of breadth in ur items psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/...
APA PsycNet
psycnet.apa.org
November 22, 2024 at 12:59 AM
One in sample size in factor analysis: psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/...
APA PsycNet
psycnet.apa.org
November 22, 2024 at 12:56 AM
Maybe if you do have the resources collecting up to 1000 ppl would be good? IMO an item pool of 30 is small! Let me dig up some papers!
November 22, 2024 at 12:54 AM
Ok cool so 30 is gonna go into a factor analysis? I think there are so many rules of thumb, like sample size depends on communalities w/ a smaller sample being alright with higher communalities. Some folks say a size of 200, 500, 1000. Other ppl recommend up to 20 cases per variable…
November 22, 2024 at 12:52 AM
How long is the list?
November 22, 2024 at 12:45 AM