Jesse Kodadek
banner
jkodadek.bsky.social
Jesse Kodadek
@jkodadek.bsky.social
Professional fighter with, like, words and stuff. Only 15 minutes from Montana.

#YIMBY
Yeah, that's what the Court already said happened in its earlier opinion:
November 19, 2025 at 6:22 PM
OK, you are right. The Court already reached this conclusion earlier:
November 19, 2025 at 5:49 PM
While local rules definitely come into play, I am not sure this order is objectionable as a matter of right, because 28 USC 636 provides:
November 18, 2025 at 12:38 AM
Greatest work email I've ever received.
November 6, 2025 at 3:41 PM
This one, in Montana, appears to have a better 360-degree view during business hours.
October 30, 2025 at 5:20 PM
Reminds me of when Montana governor Brian Schweitzer used a “VETO” branding iron to veto Republican bills. Great theater.
October 23, 2025 at 11:38 PM
The Montana Constitution continues to do the heavy lifting. #mtpol #appellatewhatever
June 9, 2025 at 10:39 PM
Things appear to being going GREAT at the Montana Supreme Court right now:
May 30, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Like these?
May 7, 2025 at 4:56 PM
Can they incorporate each others' arguments in the show cause briefs?
May 6, 2025 at 5:46 PM
Not as good as this one, probably:
April 17, 2025 at 7:32 PM
This is a good line:
April 17, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Meanwhile, in Montana, it looks like this is going to pass this legislative session:
March 22, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Note who argued the case for Idaho. Yikes.
March 20, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Correct. And to clarify the gov't thing, it is..uh...complicated, see e.g. 102 Cal.App.4th 796:
March 19, 2025 at 4:59 PM
Yes, check out this random township in SW Montana. This is 36 sections, or over 23,000 acres. The green parcels are Forest Service. The gray are privately owned and most here are owned by a single owner. (Blue is State-owned).
March 18, 2025 at 11:02 PM
Indeed.
March 11, 2025 at 12:52 AM
Wait a second...
March 11, 2025 at 12:50 AM
I am sorry but what in the hell is this? #mtpol #mtleg bills.legmt.gov#/laws/bill/2...
February 24, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Is this bad?
February 13, 2025 at 10:03 PM
That's just the first one! There is another immediately following:
January 24, 2025 at 4:37 PM
I think it is great when courts schedule oral arguments on contested motions but....this seems like a lot: (1/2)
January 24, 2025 at 4:36 PM
100%. Also, does anyone know who made this? Because I included it in a legal brief I filed on Friday.
January 6, 2025 at 8:52 PM
What do you make of this? Any tea leaves about how long to a merits ruling if the court doesn't go en banc to address the stay?
December 23, 2024 at 9:17 PM
From just a week ago:
December 18, 2024 at 6:33 PM