Jim Savell
@jimsavell.bsky.social
1L at Purdue Global Law School. Law, public policy, and sports.
But the key is, he would have to be charged.
May 2, 2025 at 3:24 PM
But the key is, he would have to be charged.
It's all about "core duties", one of the three buckets defined in that opinion. These are statutes that are not within the Constitution. So if someone were to charge him with violating 26 USC 6103 (the likelier scenario), then it is likely that it would be subject to judicial review.
May 2, 2025 at 3:24 PM
It's all about "core duties", one of the three buckets defined in that opinion. These are statutes that are not within the Constitution. So if someone were to charge him with violating 26 USC 6103 (the likelier scenario), then it is likely that it would be subject to judicial review.
This seems like a very antiquated argument. Companies that sell items made with hazardous products (regardless of where they are manufactured) can and have been held liable. Make laws against using of dangerous products. They are responsible for the manufacturing, no matter where it happens.
May 1, 2025 at 2:44 PM
This seems like a very antiquated argument. Companies that sell items made with hazardous products (regardless of where they are manufactured) can and have been held liable. Make laws against using of dangerous products. They are responsible for the manufacturing, no matter where it happens.
36 U.S.C. § 113 for reference
May 1, 2025 at 2:22 PM
36 U.S.C. § 113 for reference
But of course none of it matters because courts have ruled that the Bureau of Prisons has to provide it.
But Kamala’s team can’t even bother to explain that. She got hit and had no defense. The whole campaign was a strategical error.
But Kamala’s team can’t even bother to explain that. She got hit and had no defense. The whole campaign was a strategical error.
November 21, 2024 at 10:50 PM
But of course none of it matters because courts have ruled that the Bureau of Prisons has to provide it.
But Kamala’s team can’t even bother to explain that. She got hit and had no defense. The whole campaign was a strategical error.
But Kamala’s team can’t even bother to explain that. She got hit and had no defense. The whole campaign was a strategical error.
And yet the policy was enacted before his inauguration. See how time works? He just didn’t really care about it as the article states.
This is more about the voters and where they are than any one politician.
This is more about the voters and where they are than any one politician.
November 21, 2024 at 10:48 PM
And yet the policy was enacted before his inauguration. See how time works? He just didn’t really care about it as the article states.
This is more about the voters and where they are than any one politician.
This is more about the voters and where they are than any one politician.
There was a 2020 study down that showed Facebook users would pay as much as $5.29 a month for the platform.
I like the idea of a pay-to-use service because it raises the barrier for unserious people. It’s either that or ads.
I like the idea of a pay-to-use service because it raises the barrier for unserious people. It’s either that or ads.
November 21, 2024 at 9:08 PM
There was a 2020 study down that showed Facebook users would pay as much as $5.29 a month for the platform.
I like the idea of a pay-to-use service because it raises the barrier for unserious people. It’s either that or ads.
I like the idea of a pay-to-use service because it raises the barrier for unserious people. It’s either that or ads.
It cites a case of hers as she was the Attorney General of California from 2015 where made a settlement.
November 21, 2024 at 9:00 PM
It cites a case of hers as she was the Attorney General of California from 2015 where made a settlement.
I’ve heard that the judges in those districts that were taking senior status, just won’t take it and will remain on the court.
November 21, 2024 at 8:58 PM
I’ve heard that the judges in those districts that were taking senior status, just won’t take it and will remain on the court.
Harris’ position on this is actually “new.”
November 21, 2024 at 8:55 PM
Harris’ position on this is actually “new.”
Yes, the Bureau of Prisons is the only federal agency under court order to provide these surgeries, pursuant to 8th Amendment claims.
November 21, 2024 at 8:53 PM
Yes, the Bureau of Prisons is the only federal agency under court order to provide these surgeries, pursuant to 8th Amendment claims.
The guidelines regarding this were a last minute policy from the existing Obama administration. Trump’s administration added the “necessary” to existing policy.
November 21, 2024 at 8:52 PM
The guidelines regarding this were a last minute policy from the existing Obama administration. Trump’s administration added the “necessary” to existing policy.
Yeah, there needs to be path for people already here. And then the immigration system needs to be fixed because it’s the problem.
November 21, 2024 at 8:27 PM
Yeah, there needs to be path for people already here. And then the immigration system needs to be fixed because it’s the problem.