Jim White
@jim-at-usareset.bsky.social
Former believer in honest, high integrity judges. Now that I've had to take the State of Michigan to court I know better. Judges are into POWER, right and rule of law are irrelevant to many of them.
Sent today to the U.S. Senate.
(re usareset.net/forum/viewto...) No branch of the Federal Government is currently adhering to the Constitution:
(re usareset.net/forum/viewto...) No branch of the Federal Government is currently adhering to the Constitution:
November 24, 2025 at 7:30 PM
Sent today to the U.S. Senate.
(re usareset.net/forum/viewto...) No branch of the Federal Government is currently adhering to the Constitution:
(re usareset.net/forum/viewto...) No branch of the Federal Government is currently adhering to the Constitution:
The Michigan Supreme Court and SCOTUS remind us how judges and Justices simply ignore the Constitution by NOT making decisions. See my case 22-387 for one example. Correct arithmetic, valid logic, and understanding law in plain English are NO LONGER GUARANTEED by the U.S. Constitution.
RECENT SCOTUS RULINGS ARE A REMINDER OF HOW IMPORTANT JUDGES ARE.
📣 #Pennsylvania has 3 Dem State Supreme Court Justices up for retention this fall. Help keep them on the bench!
There's also seats up in #WI & #NC next year. Donate today!
secure.actblue.com/donate/state...
📣 #Pennsylvania has 3 Dem State Supreme Court Justices up for retention this fall. Help keep them on the bench!
There's also seats up in #WI & #NC next year. Donate today!
secure.actblue.com/donate/state...
Chip in!
Show your support with a contribution.
secure.actblue.com
September 1, 2025 at 3:54 PM
The Michigan Supreme Court and SCOTUS remind us how judges and Justices simply ignore the Constitution by NOT making decisions. See my case 22-387 for one example. Correct arithmetic, valid logic, and understanding law in plain English are NO LONGER GUARANTEED by the U.S. Constitution.
Reposted by Jim White
Dan Deacon @dtdeacon.bsky.social & I just uploaded a new/revised version of our paper “Legalistic Noncompliance.”
It’s about the Trump admin’s noncompliance with court orders - and how they’re using legal arguments to paper that over and conceal their defiance papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
It’s about the Trump admin’s noncompliance with court orders - and how they’re using legal arguments to paper that over and conceal their defiance papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Legalistic Noncompliance
Will the executive branch comply with court orders? That question has garnered a considerable amount of attention over the first few months of the second Trump
papers.ssrn.com
July 15, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Dan Deacon @dtdeacon.bsky.social & I just uploaded a new/revised version of our paper “Legalistic Noncompliance.”
It’s about the Trump admin’s noncompliance with court orders - and how they’re using legal arguments to paper that over and conceal their defiance papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
It’s about the Trump admin’s noncompliance with court orders - and how they’re using legal arguments to paper that over and conceal their defiance papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Visit congress.gov daily and demand all your Congresspeople RESCIND the Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) recently unveiled "Merit Hiring Plan" otherwise you will be very likely to become a victim of an incompetent but POWER hungry government "employee" (AKA dictator loyalist).
June 1, 2025 at 3:04 PM
Visit congress.gov daily and demand all your Congresspeople RESCIND the Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) recently unveiled "Merit Hiring Plan" otherwise you will be very likely to become a victim of an incompetent but POWER hungry government "employee" (AKA dictator loyalist).
Reposted by Jim White
This is absolutely essential reading in case you’re wondering what the wholesale dismantling of civil service work has to do with you. data4democracy.substack.com/p/how-to-dis...
How to Dismantle a Democracy, One Job Posting at a Time
OPM’s new hiring memo imports the authoritarian playbook—quietly, bureaucratically, and by design.
data4democracy.substack.com
June 1, 2025 at 2:03 PM
This is absolutely essential reading in case you’re wondering what the wholesale dismantling of civil service work has to do with you. data4democracy.substack.com/p/how-to-dis...
Reposted by Jim White
Friends!!! I have a ton of ARCs of my next novel to give away! Like and repost this to enter. I’ll pick a winner tonight (Thurs May 29) at 9 pm Eastern. US only sorry ❤️
May 29, 2025 at 4:41 PM
Friends!!! I have a ton of ARCs of my next novel to give away! Like and repost this to enter. I’ll pick a winner tonight (Thurs May 29) at 9 pm Eastern. US only sorry ❤️
Reposted by Jim White
Thank you @algreen.house.gov for your critical remarks on the floor of the House of Representatives this evening!! We must impeach, convict, and remove Trump immediately.
#Impeach47
impeachtrumpagain.org
@fsfp.bsky.social
youtu.be/05S_2DLsK8M?...
#Impeach47
impeachtrumpagain.org
@fsfp.bsky.social
youtu.be/05S_2DLsK8M?...
Rep. Green Files Impeachment Articles, Cites Trump as Threat to Democracy in ‘Dear Colleague’ Letter
YouTube video by Rep. Al Green
youtu.be
May 16, 2025 at 1:03 AM
Thank you @algreen.house.gov for your critical remarks on the floor of the House of Representatives this evening!! We must impeach, convict, and remove Trump immediately.
#Impeach47
impeachtrumpagain.org
@fsfp.bsky.social
youtu.be/05S_2DLsK8M?...
#Impeach47
impeachtrumpagain.org
@fsfp.bsky.social
youtu.be/05S_2DLsK8M?...
In olden times this same trick was done with a "white elephant," rare -- yes, but expensive to keep. Or even just an elephant or any wild animal for which care and maintenance would be beyond the reach of the recipient.
May 16, 2025 at 12:06 PM
In olden times this same trick was done with a "white elephant," rare -- yes, but expensive to keep. Or even just an elephant or any wild animal for which care and maintenance would be beyond the reach of the recipient.
NO, NO, NO! Vote EVERY Congressperson who DOES NOT take active PUBLIC steps to IMPEACH Trump or use Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 & 18 against Trump OUT OF OFFICE. Congress MUST ALSO impeach 9 "Justices" that IGNORED the Constitution's "But Congress may..." "supreme Law of the Land."
Hmmm? Had enough? Get strapped folks. Prepare. They’re already rigging the #Midterms.
It feels like 5 years already.
🤍🖤🤍🖤🤍🖤🤍🖤🤍
It feels like 5 years already.
🤍🖤🤍🖤🤍🖤🤍🖤🤍
May 16, 2025 at 11:55 AM
NO, NO, NO! Vote EVERY Congressperson who DOES NOT take active PUBLIC steps to IMPEACH Trump or use Article I, Section 8, Clauses 15 & 18 against Trump OUT OF OFFICE. Congress MUST ALSO impeach 9 "Justices" that IGNORED the Constitution's "But Congress may..." "supreme Law of the Land."
He, and 8 other (so called) "Justices" completely ignored "But Congress may..." on March 4, 2024 thus totally overriding the Plain English Understanding of Amendment XIV. Astute people in Colorado, Maine, Illinois and elsewhere were clearly doing their Constitutional duty and SCOTUS said "hell no."
May 15, 2025 at 5:33 PM
He, and 8 other (so called) "Justices" completely ignored "But Congress may..." on March 4, 2024 thus totally overriding the Plain English Understanding of Amendment XIV. Astute people in Colorado, Maine, Illinois and elsewhere were clearly doing their Constitutional duty and SCOTUS said "hell no."
Stay current on what Congress is doing. Frequently let ALL your Congresspeople know what you want (congress.gov). Make it clear that BOTH Democrats and Republicans that continue to abandon their responsibilities to "the People" will be voted OUT ASAP. Then, maybe, they will start to think and act.
May 15, 2025 at 5:11 PM
Stay current on what Congress is doing. Frequently let ALL your Congresspeople know what you want (congress.gov). Make it clear that BOTH Democrats and Republicans that continue to abandon their responsibilities to "the People" will be voted OUT ASAP. Then, maybe, they will start to think and act.
"But Congress may..." ignored by SCOTUS, all 9 "Justices." "In all Cases...in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction." SCOTUS totally ignores. Under appeal to Brett Kavanaugh: usareset.net/forum/viewto.... Hans DID NOT overturn the Constitution! Discussion?
Hans v. Louisiana (Sue a State Constitutionally) - USAreset.net/forum
usareset.net
May 8, 2025 at 4:25 PM
"But Congress may..." ignored by SCOTUS, all 9 "Justices." "In all Cases...in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction." SCOTUS totally ignores. Under appeal to Brett Kavanaugh: usareset.net/forum/viewto.... Hans DID NOT overturn the Constitution! Discussion?
Layoff saga continued: The first image shows my SCOTUS 22-387 Rehearing questions which 1. seems to be Amendment IX to me and 2. seems to involve the whole Federal United States State/Federal structure and the Supreme Court's obligation to support it as the Justices' oaths require. But denied again.
May 1, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Layoff saga continued: The first image shows my SCOTUS 22-387 Rehearing questions which 1. seems to be Amendment IX to me and 2. seems to involve the whole Federal United States State/Federal structure and the Supreme Court's obligation to support it as the Justices' oaths require. But denied again.
1/ Layoff saga continued: The first image shows my first question in my petition for certiorari to SCOTUS. The particularly important items are h, i, and j. But all appear equally valid to me. The second image is the SCOTUS case 22-387 docket where the 2022 Nov. 10 & Dec. 01 Michigan NONRESPONSES. +
May 1, 2025 at 3:47 PM
1/ Layoff saga continued: The first image shows my first question in my petition for certiorari to SCOTUS. The particularly important items are h, i, and j. But all appear equally valid to me. The second image is the SCOTUS case 22-387 docket where the 2022 Nov. 10 & Dec. 01 Michigan NONRESPONSES. +
Layoff saga continued: The first image shows the Michigan Supreme Court's Order regarding the Reconsideration request. Again, "not persuaded." No review whatsoever of the "However..." sentence. The second image shows the relevant MI Constitution change for 1963 vs the 1908 version. "Reason" ignored!
April 27, 2025 at 5:58 PM
Layoff saga continued: The first image shows the Michigan Supreme Court's Order regarding the Reconsideration request. Again, "not persuaded." No review whatsoever of the "However..." sentence. The second image shows the relevant MI Constitution change for 1963 vs the 1908 version. "Reason" ignored!
Layoff saga continued: The first three images below are the entire argument I presented when requesting a Reconsideration by the Michigan Supreme Court. The 4th image is a NOT ALLOWED by the rules UIA Reply and their first addressing of the MCL 421.48(2) "However..." sentence. Appalling on its face!
April 27, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Layoff saga continued: The first three images below are the entire argument I presented when requesting a Reconsideration by the Michigan Supreme Court. The 4th image is a NOT ALLOWED by the rules UIA Reply and their first addressing of the MCL 421.48(2) "However..." sentence. Appalling on its face!
Layoff saga continued: OK, since the Michigan (MI) Court of Appeals denied without any evidence of reading I tried simplified questions in the first below image on the MI Supreme Court. They, disregarding the MI Constitution, said "we are not persuaded" (that is NOT a MI Constitution "reason").
April 24, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Layoff saga continued: OK, since the Michigan (MI) Court of Appeals denied without any evidence of reading I tried simplified questions in the first below image on the MI Supreme Court. They, disregarding the MI Constitution, said "we are not persuaded" (that is NOT a MI Constitution "reason").
Layoff saga continued: First image is part of my request to the Michigan Court of Appeals for Reconsideration of the initial denial. It shows that the Michigan Constitution clearly mandates that both law and facts be reviewed by the court. Below that I show the ignored law. Image 2 shows 2nd denial.
April 17, 2025 at 2:52 PM
Layoff saga continued: First image is part of my request to the Michigan Court of Appeals for Reconsideration of the initial denial. It shows that the Michigan Constitution clearly mandates that both law and facts be reviewed by the court. Below that I show the ignored law. Image 2 shows 2nd denial.
Layoff saga continued: Below image is the full Michigan Appeals Court response. No effort whatsoever to even at least de novo review the relevant law. Useless and an apparent abuse of power. (But you'll notice it was real easy to do!)
April 11, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Layoff saga continued: Below image is the full Michigan Appeals Court response. No effort whatsoever to even at least de novo review the relevant law. Useless and an apparent abuse of power. (But you'll notice it was real easy to do!)
Layoff saga continued: Images show questions appealed. Quoted: MCL 421.48 (particularly "However..." of (2)), relation to MCL 421.27(c), MCL 421.38, MI Const. Art. VI Sec. 28, MCL 421.34(7) (particularly "Unless..."), MCL 408.471, CBA Art. 21, MCR 7.116(G), CBA Art. 10, MCL 24.306, Code R 792.11432
April 11, 2025 at 7:34 PM
Layoff saga continued: Images show questions appealed. Quoted: MCL 421.48 (particularly "However..." of (2)), relation to MCL 421.27(c), MCL 421.38, MI Const. Art. VI Sec. 28, MCL 421.34(7) (particularly "Unless..."), MCL 408.471, CBA Art. 21, MCR 7.116(G), CBA Art. 10, MCL 24.306, Code R 792.11432
Tell your Representatives to vote No on NORRA. Justice in one place should be the same in others. NORRA's intent (www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...) is to let the Executive branch pre-prepare many Constitutionally defiant efforts and release them all simultaneously to overwhelm the justice system!!!
www.congress.gov
April 8, 2025 at 7:23 PM
Tell your Representatives to vote No on NORRA. Justice in one place should be the same in others. NORRA's intent (www.congress.gov/bill/119th-c...) is to let the Executive branch pre-prepare many Constitutionally defiant efforts and release them all simultaneously to overwhelm the justice system!!!
Reposted by Jim White
What’s the remedy for a supermajority SCOTUS whose rulings betray the US Constitution?
April 8, 2025 at 2:40 PM
What’s the remedy for a supermajority SCOTUS whose rulings betray the US Constitution?
@dananessel.bsky.social I was at the MI capitol Saturday and heard your speech. Yes, you took an oath to the Constitution. I'm not sure why you'd enforce it against Trump administrators but not Michigan administrators. Michigan (and YOU) support Incorrect Math, Invalid Logic, and Ignoring MI Law!
April 6, 2025 at 5:45 PM
@dananessel.bsky.social I was at the MI capitol Saturday and heard your speech. Yes, you took an oath to the Constitution. I'm not sure why you'd enforce it against Trump administrators but not Michigan administrators. Michigan (and YOU) support Incorrect Math, Invalid Logic, and Ignoring MI Law!
Layoff saga continued: This is the entire Court Reconsideration Order/Denial. Note that it is NOT even for the correct case, the correct case number is simply written in. It is for a related Superintending Control case. The Judge fails to recognize that the MCAC/UIAC cannot declare a case "final." +
April 2, 2025 at 5:56 PM
Layoff saga continued: This is the entire Court Reconsideration Order/Denial. Note that it is NOT even for the correct case, the correct case number is simply written in. It is for a related Superintending Control case. The Judge fails to recognize that the MCAC/UIAC cannot declare a case "final." +
Layoff saga continued: Selected text from my Request for Reconsideration. I could have done a better job but at the time I was still operating under the belief that the law actually meant something and that the prior submitted evidence would be read and taken into consideration. Silly me!
April 1, 2025 at 8:12 PM
Layoff saga continued: Selected text from my Request for Reconsideration. I could have done a better job but at the time I was still operating under the belief that the law actually meant something and that the prior submitted evidence would be read and taken into consideration. Silly me!