Jesper W. Schneider
banner
jesper-w-schneider.bsky.social
Jesper W. Schneider
@jesper-w-schneider.bsky.social
Quantitative science studies, Meta-research, Research evaluation, Science policy, Research integrity, Statistics - Bayesian and a proud methodological terrorist
X & mastodon: @schneider_jw
Reposted by Jesper W. Schneider
What is the most profitable industry in the world, this side of the law? Not oil, not IT, not pharma.

It's *scientific publishing*.

We call this the Drain of Scientific Publishing.

Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820
Background: doi.org/10.1162/qss_...

Thread @markhanson.fediscience.org.ap.brid.gy 👇
November 12, 2025 at 10:31 AM
Reposted by Jesper W. Schneider
How can we reform science? I have some ideas. But I am not sure you’ll like them, because they don’t promise much. elevanth.org/blog/2025/07...
Which Kind of Science Reform
What hope is there for science reform, if we can't agree on what to reform? Right now, principles are more important than practices.
elevanth.org
July 9, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Forsker: Nyt udspil lover risikovillig forskning – men systemet hæmmer potentialet - Altinget
www.altinget.dk/forskning/ar...
Forsker: Nyt udspil lover risikovillig forskning – men systemet hæmmer potentialet - Altinget
Regeringens nye forskningsplan lover risikovillighed og langsigtet tænkning, men uden dybere reformer af systemet risikerer man, at systemet ikke kan absorbere forskningsmidlerne effektivt, skriver Je...
www.altinget.dk
November 5, 2025 at 11:53 AM
Reposted by Jesper W. Schneider
Against Publishing: universonline.nl/nieuws/2025/...

Preprints are read, shared, and cited, yet still dismissed as incomplete until blessed by a publisher. I argue that the true measure of scholarship lies in open exchange, not in the industry’s gatekeeping of what counts as published.
October 14, 2025 at 9:16 AM
Reposted by Jesper W. Schneider
This only happens to you once
September 26, 2025 at 7:39 PM
Reposted by Jesper W. Schneider
Simonsohn has now posted a blog response to our recent paper about the poor statistical properties of the P curve. @clintin.bsky.social and I are finishing up a less-technical paper that will serve as a response. But I wanted to address a meta-issue *around* this that may clarify some things. 1/x
Would p-curve work if you dropped a piano on it?
datacolada.org/129
September 25, 2025 at 10:07 AM
Reposted by Jesper W. Schneider
There is, I believe, only one correct answer to this problem.
September 11, 2025 at 7:27 AM
Reposted by Jesper W. Schneider
Paul Feyerabend, Against Method.

Prescriptions about how science MUST be done? Simply a bad, authoritarian idea. And based on the history of science, not good for scientific progress.

#metasci
September 9, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Reposted by Jesper W. Schneider
Being a social scientist means holding two truths at once: 1. This is all deeply complicated 2. I have to submit something by Tuesday
June 28, 2025 at 10:29 AM
Gender disparity in funding rates in double-blind grant peer review: The case of the Villum Experiment url: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
Gender disparity in funding rates in double-blind grant peer review: The case of the Villum Experiment
Abstract. The Villum Experiment (VEX) is one of the few funding schemes that employs a double-blind review process where applicants are blinded to reviewers, applications are highly standardised, revi...
direct.mit.edu
June 27, 2025 at 8:56 AM
Reposted by Jesper W. Schneider
Easy there, Tiger.
June 11, 2025 at 7:04 AM
snyder.substack.com
April 2, 2025 at 8:00 AM
Reposted by Jesper W. Schneider
This, from Timothy Snyder, is definitive, on Greenland open.substack.com/pub/snyder/p...
The Imperialism Has no Clothes
JD Vance in Greenland
open.substack.com
March 29, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Reposted by Jesper W. Schneider
March 22, 2025 at 2:42 PM