Labour will hunt you down for a tax bill you don't owe. But if you incite violence like #grahamlinehan by telling others to kick women in their genitals if you think they are trans, then it's a waste of police time. #Labour simply don't care about #womenssafety

Worryingly, that is just what Nazi Germany did to the Jews, trans people and every other minority. I voted Labour all my life, but I agree. Never again!

Hodge claimed trans people lost no rights. What! Is he in his right mind. All trans person with a GRC are no longer protected in their gender for discrimination purposes. Fact, so he's lying or thinks we're fools. The whole ruling stinks of corruption. There are so many failures of jurisprudence.

I renewed my passport recently, just in case Reform got in at the next election and I've been putting plans in place to leave overnight should the everythingist... party gain power in westminster. The Nazi model is genocide. I hadn't anticipated that would be a Labour government. But I'm ready

The judge in the #Forstater case said her belief failed #Grainger5, not worthy of respect in a democratic society without conflicting with the rights of others. Actively campaigning for the removal of the rights of #trans people is definitely a conflict. That belief should be removed from the EA2010

That's shocking. Surely someone who is a law abiding should have the right to dress how they like. Also with the increasing use of facial recognition technology it seems essential that you can’t be mistaken by faulty tech. Arevthe police to be allowed to cover their faces?

If some women have an advantage, then cancel all medals won in the past, as they might have had an advantage due to their hormones. Not my preferred outcome, Sharon Davies is a tall muscle is she trans or has dsd, or raised testosterone levels, should relinquish her medals. £ is the big advantage.

Section 221 of the ruling, tells the EHRC that paragraph 28 is still relevant in a biological sex ruling, saying that trans womens exclusion is only lawful if proportional. They say it's propotional in the case of a womens group supporting abuse survivors, but that's not likely the case of toilets?

Reading back the comments by the gender complainers on the LinkedIn site they really only have trans dogwhistle things to say. Its childish. As Shon Faye said, there is no critical thought or argument put forward.

Their alleged close relationship with the EHRC chair Falkner raises many questions

Melanie's analysis was sensible and thoughtful. Disgusting comments by the gender critics. Did they hear the judge when it concerns Grainger 5. It's not a belief, it's bigotry.

What was it the judge said about Maya Forstater "her views were not worthy of respect in a modern day society"

I suppose she thinks capitalist, make all the rich, richer, policies do. It's why everyone has stopped listening to them and is joining the green party 🙂

It seems like it's gonna take these companies being sued, before this Labour government remembers it's legal duty, and sorts this Humans Rights abomination out

The Labour government has had since the 16th of April to save all this distress and confusion. It would take a simple amendment of primary legislation to get us back to the error made by the SC, and get us all back to the equal and respectful, legal regime that has worked without issues for decades

It's the result of a court case by For (Some) Women Scotland that was never gonna help anybody, a shockingly inept ruling by the Supreme Court who never spoke to any stakeholders but gender complaing bigots, and an anti-trans EHRC that decided make it's disgusting trans exclusionary advice public

Yes, horrible. As I understand it he didn't know she was trans until she told him, and presumably would have continued the relationship. So he liked their relationship. There was no deception in my opinion.

It smells to me like the panic defense we see in the states, except it's panic prosecution

The phone isn't the danger. It's the bigots and transphobes that spout lies and misinformation about trans people. That's gender complaing bigots, the rightwing media, who have regulator that is totally useless, and many politicians who don’t condemn those lies. They will still use phones at home.

… Lord Filkin when taking the GRA through Parliament in 2003 (speaking about the effect on the SDA, the EA, predecessor) and Vera Baird when similarly handling the passage of the EA in 2009. I post both below.

As a feminist and trans ally, I don't limit my view of women to only those who have eggs. It belittles all of us, by breaking us down to our body parts.

So I can't agree.