For more on Wisconsin’s new spending plan and the negotiations that made it happen, @fayeparks.bsky.social sat down with @jrrosswrites.bsky.social.
www.wortfm.org/wispolitics-...
For more on Wisconsin’s new spending plan and the negotiations that made it happen, @fayeparks.bsky.social sat down with @jrrosswrites.bsky.social.
www.wortfm.org/wispolitics-...
*Unlike prior tax cuts, which tended to throw the poor a bone or hold them harmless, this bill makes them materially worse off
*It connects safety net reductions with tax cuts. There was a time politicians did not dare to do so. No more.
*Unlike prior tax cuts, which tended to throw the poor a bone or hold them harmless, this bill makes them materially worse off
*It connects safety net reductions with tax cuts. There was a time politicians did not dare to do so. No more.
Answer: 677,000. That's 44% of the entire non-DoD federal workforce.
Again, this power grab is not about the budget. It’s about politics.
Answer: 677,000. That's 44% of the entire non-DoD federal workforce.
Again, this power grab is not about the budget. It’s about politics.
1: Keep your winning coalition as small as possible
2: Keep your nominal electorate as large as possible
3: Control the flow of revenue
4: Pay your key supporters just enough to keep them loyal
5: Don't take money out of your supporters' pockets to make the people's lives better
1: Keep your winning coalition as small as possible
2: Keep your nominal electorate as large as possible
3: Control the flow of revenue
4: Pay your key supporters just enough to keep them loyal
5: Don't take money out of your supporters' pockets to make the people's lives better
Source: ncses.nsf.gov/surveys/fede... (table 26)
(Not going to do a whole thread but thought folks might be interested.)