Didn't take long for the court to explain to the lawyers how motions work.

Didn't take long for the court to explain what motions are for.

Didn't take long for the court to point that out.

Because they decide Title II classification is inconsistent with the plain language of the statute, they don't do any Major Questions analysis.

Sixth Circuit Net Neutrality decision is out: www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf...

Still digesting the reasoning, but the conclusion is bad: court holds that broadband internet access services are unambiguously Title I, and vacates all the net neutrality rules.

Reminds me of video for Nobody Speak by DJ Shadow/Run the Jewels. It's chock full of profanity so I'm gonna let folks google it if they want to see/hear it.

I have a new project. I call it the "Brooklyn Bridge." It will be available before 2027. In the meantime, check this out.

This article is exactly as good as the headline would suggest.

I know we're a law school and everything, but do the library doors have to be an fact pattern for an exam?

This may be my favorite spam text of the many I have gotten.

Congrats on the victory for public.resource.org! Confirmed: making the law available to the public is fair use.

www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opi...