Jay W
@jaydeedouble.bsky.social
“Hollywood Douchebag Producer” who makes things you watch on screens of various sizes...
안녕하세요!
안녕하세요!
I can’t watch the new HBO series. “I Love LA”, because it reminds me that those influencer douchebags are all over the city.
LA is meant to be enjoyed under crushing poverty where you only get to live like a rockstar 1 night a week. Two if you’re lucky.
It builds character.
LA is meant to be enjoyed under crushing poverty where you only get to live like a rockstar 1 night a week. Two if you’re lucky.
It builds character.
November 11, 2025 at 4:02 AM
I can’t watch the new HBO series. “I Love LA”, because it reminds me that those influencer douchebags are all over the city.
LA is meant to be enjoyed under crushing poverty where you only get to live like a rockstar 1 night a week. Two if you’re lucky.
It builds character.
LA is meant to be enjoyed under crushing poverty where you only get to live like a rockstar 1 night a week. Two if you’re lucky.
It builds character.
*trillionaire on paper
November 11, 2025 at 3:47 AM
*trillionaire on paper
They get so angry when we quote Charlie Kirk… can’t imagine why
November 11, 2025 at 3:20 AM
They get so angry when we quote Charlie Kirk… can’t imagine why
“Your intolerance of my intolerance, means you’re the bad one!”
November 11, 2025 at 2:10 AM
“Your intolerance of my intolerance, means you’re the bad one!”
I honestly said last night:
“Wait… is this what it’s like to be a modern Republican? Some elected official says some complete nonsense… and they just expect you to ignore reality and cheer them? How stupid is that…?”
“Wait… is this what it’s like to be a modern Republican? Some elected official says some complete nonsense… and they just expect you to ignore reality and cheer them? How stupid is that…?”
November 11, 2025 at 2:09 AM
I honestly said last night:
“Wait… is this what it’s like to be a modern Republican? Some elected official says some complete nonsense… and they just expect you to ignore reality and cheer them? How stupid is that…?”
“Wait… is this what it’s like to be a modern Republican? Some elected official says some complete nonsense… and they just expect you to ignore reality and cheer them? How stupid is that…?”
Hopefully you don’t have a porn twin…(?)
November 11, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Hopefully you don’t have a porn twin…(?)
Ditto with Joe Manchin
November 11, 2025 at 12:31 AM
Ditto with Joe Manchin
I feel like Bill Maher would have been the more accurate reference…
November 11, 2025 at 12:30 AM
I feel like Bill Maher would have been the more accurate reference…
I feel like this is the millennial version of 6-7… and I will not be suckered into trying to understand it.
November 11, 2025 at 12:29 AM
I feel like this is the millennial version of 6-7… and I will not be suckered into trying to understand it.
Just waiting to hear the announcement that Paramount+ will be airing “entertainment” from the Daily Wire’s version of Netflix…
November 11, 2025 at 12:11 AM
Just waiting to hear the announcement that Paramount+ will be airing “entertainment” from the Daily Wire’s version of Netflix…
The extra comedy here is that she, previous to being White House press secretary… Was found to have been getting paid by a fugitive white collar criminal, while writing op-eds defending him.
November 10, 2025 at 11:50 PM
The extra comedy here is that she, previous to being White House press secretary… Was found to have been getting paid by a fugitive white collar criminal, while writing op-eds defending him.
"White House furious that their leader is such an idiotic and gullible mark"
November 10, 2025 at 11:29 PM
"White House furious that their leader is such an idiotic and gullible mark"
I'm just waiting to see how he loots that Tariff money for he and his supporters... before SCOTUS rules that it all has to go back.
November 10, 2025 at 11:13 PM
I'm just waiting to see how he loots that Tariff money for he and his supporters... before SCOTUS rules that it all has to go back.
Gotta loot those bucks before SCOTUS orders you to pay it all back...
November 10, 2025 at 10:52 PM
Gotta loot those bucks before SCOTUS orders you to pay it all back...
The only point of that "deal"... was to have a Senate vote that candidates could point to, when families are raging about their new healthcare costs.
It wasn't to actually stop those costs from soaring.
It wasn't to actually stop those costs from soaring.
November 10, 2025 at 10:51 PM
The only point of that "deal"... was to have a Senate vote that candidates could point to, when families are raging about their new healthcare costs.
It wasn't to actually stop those costs from soaring.
It wasn't to actually stop those costs from soaring.
It’s like those massive stacks of binders Trump showed off during his first term we’re just blank paper…
November 10, 2025 at 9:43 PM
It’s like those massive stacks of binders Trump showed off during his first term we’re just blank paper…
SNAP was not fully funded, as required by federal law.
Once again, the federal law requires that SNAP be fully funded, using the emergency fund. Choosing not to do so, is in violation of federal law.
Hence the reason the administration has lost every court case on their refusal to do so, so far
Once again, the federal law requires that SNAP be fully funded, using the emergency fund. Choosing not to do so, is in violation of federal law.
Hence the reason the administration has lost every court case on their refusal to do so, so far
November 10, 2025 at 8:31 PM
SNAP was not fully funded, as required by federal law.
Once again, the federal law requires that SNAP be fully funded, using the emergency fund. Choosing not to do so, is in violation of federal law.
Hence the reason the administration has lost every court case on their refusal to do so, so far
Once again, the federal law requires that SNAP be fully funded, using the emergency fund. Choosing not to do so, is in violation of federal law.
Hence the reason the administration has lost every court case on their refusal to do so, so far
Jared Kushner certainly loves associating with scumbags...
November 10, 2025 at 8:22 PM
Jared Kushner certainly loves associating with scumbags...
The Fox News Administration... strikes again.
November 10, 2025 at 8:17 PM
The Fox News Administration... strikes again.
"Look, we could of let SCOTUS decide that Trump was violating federal law, by intentionally starving poor people... but we decided that would be bad"
November 10, 2025 at 8:14 PM
"Look, we could of let SCOTUS decide that Trump was violating federal law, by intentionally starving poor people... but we decided that would be bad"
Once again, Federal Law mandates the emergency fund be used to fund SNAP.
SNAP needs funding.
The emergency fund has the money to fund it.
Plain and simple.
The Executive Branch cannot legally ignore Federal Law.
That’s how Federal Laws work
SNAP needs funding.
The emergency fund has the money to fund it.
Plain and simple.
The Executive Branch cannot legally ignore Federal Law.
That’s how Federal Laws work
November 10, 2025 at 7:16 PM
Once again, Federal Law mandates the emergency fund be used to fund SNAP.
SNAP needs funding.
The emergency fund has the money to fund it.
Plain and simple.
The Executive Branch cannot legally ignore Federal Law.
That’s how Federal Laws work
SNAP needs funding.
The emergency fund has the money to fund it.
Plain and simple.
The Executive Branch cannot legally ignore Federal Law.
That’s how Federal Laws work
You will eat your Chef Boyardee and like it!
November 10, 2025 at 6:00 PM
You will eat your Chef Boyardee and like it!
To be clear.
Federal Law requires SNAP to be funded by the emergency fund.
There is no discretionary or voluntary wording in Federal Law. Only a requirement.
Your position is that the Executive Branch can ignore Federal Law. Which is curious, given it’s a violation of the Constitution
Federal Law requires SNAP to be funded by the emergency fund.
There is no discretionary or voluntary wording in Federal Law. Only a requirement.
Your position is that the Executive Branch can ignore Federal Law. Which is curious, given it’s a violation of the Constitution
November 10, 2025 at 5:44 PM
To be clear.
Federal Law requires SNAP to be funded by the emergency fund.
There is no discretionary or voluntary wording in Federal Law. Only a requirement.
Your position is that the Executive Branch can ignore Federal Law. Which is curious, given it’s a violation of the Constitution
Federal Law requires SNAP to be funded by the emergency fund.
There is no discretionary or voluntary wording in Federal Law. Only a requirement.
Your position is that the Executive Branch can ignore Federal Law. Which is curious, given it’s a violation of the Constitution