Jane Harbison
@janeharbison.bsky.social
Education, Politics, Social Justice, Europe
ex LA Senior Adviser, researcher, waitress, company director, traveller.
ex LA Senior Adviser, researcher, waitress, company director, traveller.
What Hamas and Israel are doing is truly appalling. Innocent people suffering because of them.
They can stop this but hate is corrosive
They can stop this but hate is corrosive
November 23, 2025 at 6:48 PM
What Hamas and Israel are doing is truly appalling. Innocent people suffering because of them.
They can stop this but hate is corrosive
They can stop this but hate is corrosive
So you say but think what keeps you happy
November 23, 2025 at 6:45 PM
So you say but think what keeps you happy
The blame lies with Hamas, Israel and the USA.
November 23, 2025 at 6:12 PM
The blame lies with Hamas, Israel and the USA.
Blocking no time for the ignorant
November 23, 2025 at 4:53 PM
Blocking no time for the ignorant
Don’t agree with your statements - the govt is not supporting genocide -a convenient smears by the Left
Definitely not aping Farage
Safeguarding children
Definitely not aping Farage
Safeguarding children
November 23, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Don’t agree with your statements - the govt is not supporting genocide -a convenient smears by the Left
Definitely not aping Farage
Safeguarding children
Definitely not aping Farage
Safeguarding children
I do understand that -my point was that theEU leaders are working together outside of NATO and inside also-strengthening bonds and common purpose.
NATO needs to be strengthened not disbanded -we have common enemies.
NATO needs to be strengthened not disbanded -we have common enemies.
November 23, 2025 at 4:47 PM
I do understand that -my point was that theEU leaders are working together outside of NATO and inside also-strengthening bonds and common purpose.
NATO needs to be strengthened not disbanded -we have common enemies.
NATO needs to be strengthened not disbanded -we have common enemies.
Sick of this. Concerted attempt to get rid of Starmer and replace him with people who would definitely lose the next election -just stop.
November 23, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Sick of this. Concerted attempt to get rid of Starmer and replace him with people who would definitely lose the next election -just stop.
Reposted by Jane Harbison
Nonsense. At last we have an intelligent, totally honest prime minister who has experience outside of politics. (Yes, he bought a donkey field for his mum and accepted some clothes and spectacles from a donor.) He actually cares about people and visits his constituency. Let's give him the full term.
November 22, 2025 at 10:58 PM
Nonsense. At last we have an intelligent, totally honest prime minister who has experience outside of politics. (Yes, he bought a donkey field for his mum and accepted some clothes and spectacles from a donor.) He actually cares about people and visits his constituency. Let's give him the full term.
No idea what point that was but whatever
November 23, 2025 at 2:16 PM
No idea what point that was but whatever
Who says they have to stay in appalling accommodation ?
November 23, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Who says they have to stay in appalling accommodation ?
Depends where they stay -no one wants anyone to be in vermin infested accommodation.
November 23, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Depends where they stay -no one wants anyone to be in vermin infested accommodation.
Mine looks after people who need looking after
November 23, 2025 at 1:30 PM
Mine looks after people who need looking after
That’s your choice - I would rather my money looked after those who have nothing or very little
November 23, 2025 at 12:56 PM
That’s your choice - I would rather my money looked after those who have nothing or very little
Most aren’t but if there are some who have money then they should pay. We must look after those who have nothing or very little
November 23, 2025 at 12:56 PM
Most aren’t but if there are some who have money then they should pay. We must look after those who have nothing or very little
Against the govt.
The evidence is there in Hansard
I thought the refrain was ‘tax the rich’ if they can afford to pay they should or would you rather the taxpayer paid for them?
The evidence is there in Hansard
I thought the refrain was ‘tax the rich’ if they can afford to pay they should or would you rather the taxpayer paid for them?
November 23, 2025 at 12:43 PM
Against the govt.
The evidence is there in Hansard
I thought the refrain was ‘tax the rich’ if they can afford to pay they should or would you rather the taxpayer paid for them?
The evidence is there in Hansard
I thought the refrain was ‘tax the rich’ if they can afford to pay they should or would you rather the taxpayer paid for them?
The trouble is you only see what suits your prejudice.
November 23, 2025 at 12:41 PM
The trouble is you only see what suits your prejudice.
She explicitly ruled out taking jewellery.
If they are rich do you think it’s right that the taxpayer looks after them? Shouldn’t the rich pay more?
If they are rich do you think it’s right that the taxpayer looks after them? Shouldn’t the rich pay more?
November 23, 2025 at 12:40 PM
She explicitly ruled out taking jewellery.
If they are rich do you think it’s right that the taxpayer looks after them? Shouldn’t the rich pay more?
If they are rich do you think it’s right that the taxpayer looks after them? Shouldn’t the rich pay more?
I look at what they are doing and most of it is very positive.
They have made some mistakes but those are being rectified.
They have made some mistakes but those are being rectified.
November 23, 2025 at 12:38 PM
I look at what they are doing and most of it is very positive.
They have made some mistakes but those are being rectified.
They have made some mistakes but those are being rectified.
I don’t think that at all
November 23, 2025 at 12:37 PM
I don’t think that at all