Janan Mostajabi
@jananmost.bsky.social
Clinical psychology Ph.D. student, University of Michigan | Affective dynamics, impulsivity, psychopathology | University of California, Berkeley alum | Part-time cinephile https://www.jananmostajabi.com/
Hey #SRP2025! Curious about how context shapes impulsive action and inaction in daily life? Come chat with me about our findings!
🗓️ Tonight (Thurs), 7-9pm
📍 Poster T72, The Topography of Momentary Impulsivity: Context Matters
🗓️ Tonight (Thurs), 7-9pm
📍 Poster T72, The Topography of Momentary Impulsivity: Context Matters
September 25, 2025 at 4:47 PM
Hey #SRP2025! Curious about how context shapes impulsive action and inaction in daily life? Come chat with me about our findings!
🗓️ Tonight (Thurs), 7-9pm
📍 Poster T72, The Topography of Momentary Impulsivity: Context Matters
🗓️ Tonight (Thurs), 7-9pm
📍 Poster T72, The Topography of Momentary Impulsivity: Context Matters
At #APS25DC this week? Come check out our symposium on Friday at 1pm! Featuring @whitneyringwald.bsky.social, @hfla-phd.bsky.social, @jnfrltackett.bsky.social, and Sylia Wilson!
May 22, 2025 at 12:48 PM
At #APS25DC this week? Come check out our symposium on Friday at 1pm! Featuring @whitneyringwald.bsky.social, @hfla-phd.bsky.social, @jnfrltackett.bsky.social, and Sylia Wilson!
Our results (summarized in the table below) suggest that the cooccurrence of intense instances of emotion and impulsivity was more strongly associated with trait scores of urgency and impulsivity relative to the traditional emotion-impulsivity covariance approach. 10/n
May 14, 2025 at 11:59 AM
Our results (summarized in the table below) suggest that the cooccurrence of intense instances of emotion and impulsivity was more strongly associated with trait scores of urgency and impulsivity relative to the traditional emotion-impulsivity covariance approach. 10/n
Let’s look at an example in the figure below. 5/n
May 14, 2025 at 11:59 AM
Let’s look at an example in the figure below. 5/n
The HiTOP-PRO domains correlated with individual differences in daily outcomes as expected, with overall positive correlations with negative affect and stress, and negative links with positive affect, energy, and sleep quality. Associations with social interaction outcomes were less robust.
10/
10/
January 30, 2025 at 1:20 PM
The HiTOP-PRO domains correlated with individual differences in daily outcomes as expected, with overall positive correlations with negative affect and stress, and negative links with positive affect, energy, and sleep quality. Associations with social interaction outcomes were less robust.
10/
10/
Exploratory factor analysis indicated a nine-factor model, similar to the HiTOP’s current structure, best represented the measure.
Check out the outcome of the bass-ackwards technique, visualizing the hierarchical structure of the measure with 1-9 factors.
6/
Check out the outcome of the bass-ackwards technique, visualizing the hierarchical structure of the measure with 1-9 factors.
6/
January 30, 2025 at 1:20 PM
Exploratory factor analysis indicated a nine-factor model, similar to the HiTOP’s current structure, best represented the measure.
Check out the outcome of the bass-ackwards technique, visualizing the hierarchical structure of the measure with 1-9 factors.
6/
Check out the outcome of the bass-ackwards technique, visualizing the hierarchical structure of the measure with 1-9 factors.
6/