James Woodfield
@jameswoodfield.bsky.social
“Myself when young did eagerly frequent
Doctor and Saint, and heard great Argument
About it and about: but evermore
Came out by the same Door where in I went.”
“The Bird of Time has but a little way
To flutter – and the Bird is on the Wing.”
Doctor and Saint, and heard great Argument
About it and about: but evermore
Came out by the same Door where in I went.”
“The Bird of Time has but a little way
To flutter – and the Bird is on the Wing.”
That’ll do the trick. Everybody listens to Starmer. Remember how hostilities in Palestine ceased the moment Starmer urged restraint?
November 11, 2025 at 9:40 AM
That’ll do the trick. Everybody listens to Starmer. Remember how hostilities in Palestine ceased the moment Starmer urged restraint?
Evidently, ‘Britain Needs Reform’ like it needs a hole in the head.
November 11, 2025 at 9:31 AM
Evidently, ‘Britain Needs Reform’ like it needs a hole in the head.
Trump’s usual MO is to extort money from his victims via an out of court ‘settlement’, isn’t it?
But his threatening letter to the BBC seeks recompense for
“false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements” it made about him in its TV doc.
Were there actually any actionable statements?
But his threatening letter to the BBC seeks recompense for
“false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements” it made about him in its TV doc.
Were there actually any actionable statements?
November 11, 2025 at 9:27 AM
Trump’s usual MO is to extort money from his victims via an out of court ‘settlement’, isn’t it?
But his threatening letter to the BBC seeks recompense for
“false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements” it made about him in its TV doc.
Were there actually any actionable statements?
But his threatening letter to the BBC seeks recompense for
“false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements” it made about him in its TV doc.
Were there actually any actionable statements?
Reposted by James Woodfield
Gibb, a man of such unacceptably low principles that he considered Vote Leave’s conning of the electorate via the notorious “bus lie” to be a valid form of electioneering. He’s a cancer in the corporation.
November 11, 2025 at 7:45 AM
Gibb, a man of such unacceptably low principles that he considered Vote Leave’s conning of the electorate via the notorious “bus lie” to be a valid form of electioneering. He’s a cancer in the corporation.
Reposted by James Woodfield
The important thing here is simply to use the word "peaceful" a single time in a speech that runs over an hour, despite the fact that you've told the angry armed mob in front of you—which you know is armed—to be "wild" and "fight" and told them to do something they can't possibly do without violence
November 10, 2025 at 8:20 PM
The important thing here is simply to use the word "peaceful" a single time in a speech that runs over an hour, despite the fact that you've told the angry armed mob in front of you—which you know is armed—to be "wild" and "fight" and told them to do something they can't possibly do without violence
Reposted by James Woodfield
Some preliminary points:
Trump is unlikely to succeed in a claim for defamation against the BBC (on information available).
Even if he succeeded, damages for this alleged defamation would be no more than about £50k, probably less. Even the worst libels, now no more than about £100k.
£1bn? No way.
Trump is unlikely to succeed in a claim for defamation against the BBC (on information available).
Even if he succeeded, damages for this alleged defamation would be no more than about £50k, probably less. Even the worst libels, now no more than about £100k.
£1bn? No way.
November 10, 2025 at 4:53 PM
Some preliminary points:
Trump is unlikely to succeed in a claim for defamation against the BBC (on information available).
Even if he succeeded, damages for this alleged defamation would be no more than about £50k, probably less. Even the worst libels, now no more than about £100k.
£1bn? No way.
Trump is unlikely to succeed in a claim for defamation against the BBC (on information available).
Even if he succeeded, damages for this alleged defamation would be no more than about £50k, probably less. Even the worst libels, now no more than about £100k.
£1bn? No way.
Reposted by James Woodfield
😤 but now what? What can the regular ordinary person do about this ? It’s so frustrating -what kind of governance allows someone connected with GB ‘news’ to sit in the board of the BBC ? www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/poli...
Former No 10 official ‘leading effort to launch BBC competitor’
Sir Robbie Gibb believed to be behind drive to raise money for rival news channel
www.independent.co.uk
November 10, 2025 at 11:29 AM
😤 but now what? What can the regular ordinary person do about this ? It’s so frustrating -what kind of governance allows someone connected with GB ‘news’ to sit in the board of the BBC ? www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/poli...
“Took time off..”
bsky.app/profile/ronf...
bsky.app/profile/ronf...
With the government shut down, flights cancelled, and hungry people going without SNAP benefits, Trump leaves his newly gilded palace for another weekend of golf and parties in Palm Beach.
November 10, 2025 at 3:50 PM
“Took time off..”
bsky.app/profile/ronf...
bsky.app/profile/ronf...