Spoilers for basically everything I like, but especially FGO JP.
And I just don't get it
And I just don't get it
Anyway, Orleans spoils Ruler OC a lot.
bsky.app/profile/jale...
That said, given the Ruler OC is upcoming, I'm curious about exploring Jeanne's initial characterization again.
Anyway, Orleans spoils Ruler OC a lot.
bsky.app/profile/jale...
I know that's supposed to read as arc 1 finale foreshadowing, but... I can't help but think about how much that line might also apply to a certain somebody dying at the end of arc 2 who is very important to Mash...
HOW MUCH DO YOU KNOW?
I know that's supposed to read as arc 1 finale foreshadowing, but... I can't help but think about how much that line might also apply to a certain somebody dying at the end of arc 2 who is very important to Mash...
HOW MUCH DO YOU KNOW?
Because this is quite literally just about Ritsuka absorbing the curses of each Lostbelt so that she can someday give back to them.
Because this is quite literally just about Ritsuka absorbing the curses of each Lostbelt so that she can someday give back to them.
But still, if it's human to decide for yourself, what does it imply about non-human things that possess that ability?
But still, if it's human to decide for yourself, what does it imply about non-human things that possess that ability?
Then again, what does it say for a Demon God Pillar to be telling Mash something this vital to her character?
Then again, what does it say for a Demon God Pillar to be telling Mash something this vital to her character?
I guess the same can be said about Goetia, right? And even Ritsuka to a certain extent. Within that rigid framework, what is too much?
I guess the same can be said about Goetia, right? And even Ritsuka to a certain extent. Within that rigid framework, what is too much?
It makes me wonder a lot about what her perspective on the Bleaching would be.
It makes me wonder a lot about what her perspective on the Bleaching would be.
Because he's talking about how Marie could've been the one to save them, but in Id the one who stops Ritsuka from choosing vengeance is Mash just by existing.
Because he's talking about how Marie could've been the one to save them, but in Id the one who stops Ritsuka from choosing vengeance is Mash just by existing.
But I think there's definitely something to be said about this "ideal King" archetype and how it relates to purity.
But I think there's definitely something to be said about this "ideal King" archetype and how it relates to purity.
So is that a Singularity or a Lostbelt? And how is it a Lostbelt if it was never pruned?
It just feels like there's a missing piece sometimes.
So is that a Singularity or a Lostbelt? And how is it a Lostbelt if it was never pruned?
It just feels like there's a missing piece sometimes.
Why can a Singularity become a Lostbelt if it's not resolved soon enough? That's the consequence of a pruned world being brought back, right? How does that apply?
Why can a Singularity become a Lostbelt if it's not resolved soon enough? That's the consequence of a pruned world being brought back, right? How does that apply?
But I guess I could say the same about Lostbelts?
But I guess I could say the same about Lostbelts?
So how do they know about Apocrypha?
So how do they know about Apocrypha?
A Ruler with the right to judge the world, and choose destruction if necessary.
A Ruler with the right to judge the world, and choose destruction if necessary.
But does that mean the Priestess is the Ruler Servant for the Lostbelts?
But does that mean the Priestess is the Ruler Servant for the Lostbelts?